-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
⬆️ Feat: Upgrade to ethereumjs alpha.1 #1486
base: 11-01-_recycle_feat_reset_storage_slot_if_more_than_one_is_found
Are you sure you want to change the base?
⬆️ Feat: Upgrade to ethereumjs alpha.1 #1486
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to various Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
packages/address/src/create2ContractAddress.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-30
: Consider updating related documentation.The changes to
EthjsAddress
instantiation in this file are consistent and appear to be part of a larger update to theEthjsAddress
API. While the test logic remains intact, it might be beneficial to ensure that any related documentation or examples in the codebase are also updated to reflect this new instantiation method.packages/address/src/createContractAddress.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-37
: Summary: Address creation updated successfully across test cases.The changes in this file consistently update the address creation method from using
EthjsAddress.fromString
tonew Address(hexToBytes(...))
. These modifications align with the new import statements and maintain the original intent of the test cases. The core logic and expectations of the tests remain intact, ensuring that thecreateContractAddress
function is still properly tested for both zero and non-zero nonces.To further improve the test file:
- Consider adding a test case for a larger nonce value to ensure correct behavior with multi-byte nonces.
- You might want to add a test case to verify that the created contract address is different for the same
from
address with different nonces.Would you like me to provide example implementations for these additional test cases?
packages/rlp/package.json (1)
Line range hint
2-2
: Consider updating the package versionThe package version is still set to 1.0.0-next.117, despite the significant dependency update.
Consider incrementing the package version to reflect this change, especially if the new alpha version of @ethereumjs/rlp introduces any breaking changes or new features that affect your package's behavior.
packages/tx/package.json (1)
66-71
: Consider the impact of alpha releases on package stabilityBoth @ethereumjs/tx and @ethereumjs/common have been updated to alpha versions. This could potentially introduce instability to your package.
Consider the following:
- Is there a specific reason for adopting these alpha releases?
- Have you thoroughly tested your package with these new versions?
- Are you prepared to handle potential breaking changes in future updates?
- Consider adding a note in your package documentation about the use of alpha dependencies.
If these alpha releases are necessary for new features or bug fixes, ensure you have a plan to closely monitor and quickly respond to any issues that may arise from these dependencies.
packages/common/src/createCommon.js (2)
Line range hint
62-76
: LGTM: Updated implementation usingcreateCustomCommon
The function has been successfully updated to use
createCustomCommon
instead ofCommon.custom
. This change aligns with the new import statement and likely reflects an API update in the@ethereumjs/common
package.A few observations:
- The core parameters remain similar, ensuring consistency with the previous implementation.
- Additional EIPs (1559, 4895, 4844, 4788) are now included by default in the
eips
array.Consider updating the function's JSDoc comment to reflect the usage of
createCustomCommon
and the default inclusion of additional EIPs.
Line range hint
81-86
: Consider optimizing thecopy
methodThe
copy
method in the returned object still uses the originalcreateCommon
function. For consistency and potential performance improvement, consider updating it to usecreateCustomCommon
directly.Here's a suggested optimization:
copy: () => { - const ethjsCommonCopy = ethjsCommon.copy() - const newCommon = createCommon({ loggingLevel, hardfork, eips, ...chain }) - newCommon.ethjsCommon = ethjsCommonCopy + const ethjsCommonCopy = createCustomCommon( + { + name: 'TevmCustom', + chainId: chain.id, + }, + { + hardfork: hardfork, + baseChain: 1, + eips: [...eips, 1559, 4895, 4844, 4788], + customCrypto: { + kzg: createMockKzg(), + ...customCrypto, + }, + }, + ) + const newCommon = { + ...chain, + ethjsCommon: ethjsCommonCopy, + copy: this.copy, + } return newCommon }This change would make the
copy
method more consistent with the main function implementation and potentially more efficient by avoiding an unnecessary call tocreateCommon
.tevm/docs/common/interfaces/EvmStateManagerInterface.md (1)
Line range hint
1-535
: Summary of changes and recommendationsThe main changes in this file involve renaming
EvmStateManagerInterface
toStateManagerInterface
and updating theshallowCopy
method's return type accordingly. While these changes appear straightforward, they may have significant implications across the codebase. Here's a summary of the key points and recommendations:
The interface has been renamed, but the file name remains unchanged. Consider updating the file name to match the new interface name for consistency.
The interface now extends
StateManagerInterface
instead of itself, which might indicate a restructuring of the interface hierarchy. Ensure this change aligns with the intended design.The
shallowCopy
method's return type has been updated to reflect the new interface name. Verify that this change doesn't introduce any breaking changes in the codebase.Run the provided verification scripts to identify areas in the codebase that might need updates due to these changes.
Update all references to this interface throughout the codebase, including import statements, implementations, and documentation.
Review and update any unit tests that might be affected by these changes.
Consider adding a deprecation notice or migration guide if this is a breaking change that affects external users of the library.
Given the scope of these changes, it might be beneficial to:
- Document the rationale behind this renaming in the PR description or in a separate design document.
- Consider using TypeScript's
--strict
mode (if not already in use) to catch any type-related issues that might arise from this change.- If this is part of a larger refactoring effort, consider creating a migration guide for users of the library.
tevm/docs/state/interfaces/StateManager.md (1)
Line range hint
1-682
: Summary: Consistent update of StateManager interfaceThe changes in this file consistently update the
StateManager
interface to extendStateManagerInterface
instead ofEvmStateManagerInterface
. This includes updating the interface extension, property inheritances, method inheritances, and return types. These changes appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort in the state management system.To ensure the completeness of this refactoring:
- Update any related documentation that might still reference
EvmStateManagerInterface
.- Review and update any implementations of
StateManager
to ensure they comply with the newStateManagerInterface
.- Consider adding a brief comment in the interface documentation explaining the reason for this change, which could help other developers understand the evolution of the state management system.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (29)
- extensions/viem/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/address/src/create2ContractAddress.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/address/src/createContractAddress.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/blockchain/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/common/docs/globals.md (1 hunks)
- packages/common/docs/interfaces/EvmStateManagerInterface.md (2 hunks)
- packages/common/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/common/src/createCommon.js (2 hunks)
- packages/common/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/errors/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/errors/src/ethereum/ethereumjs/AuthCallUnsetError.js (0 hunks)
- packages/errors/src/ethereum/ethereumjs/index.ts (0 hunks)
- packages/errors/src/ethereum/index.ts (0 hunks)
- packages/errors/src/index.ts (0 hunks)
- packages/evm/docs/interfaces/InterpreterStep.md (1 hunks)
- packages/evm/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/rlp/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/state/docs/interfaces/StateManager.md (25 hunks)
- packages/state/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/state/src/StateManager.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/tx/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/utils/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/utils/src/ethereumjs.js (1 hunks)
- packages/utils/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/vm/package.json (1 hunks)
- tevm/docs/common/README.md (1 hunks)
- tevm/docs/common/interfaces/EvmStateManagerInterface.md (2 hunks)
- tevm/docs/evm/interfaces/InterpreterStep.md (1 hunks)
- tevm/docs/state/interfaces/StateManager.md (25 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- packages/errors/src/ethereum/ethereumjs/AuthCallUnsetError.js
- packages/errors/src/ethereum/ethereumjs/index.ts
- packages/errors/src/ethereum/index.ts
- packages/errors/src/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
packages/common/src/index.ts
[error] 8-8: Useless rename.
Safe fix: Remove the renaming.
(lint/complexity/noUselessRename)
🔇 Additional comments (42)
packages/utils/src/ethereumjs.js (2)
24-31
: LGTM: Newzeros
function implementation looks good.The new
zeros
function is well-implemented and properly documented. It efficiently creates a Uint8Array of the specified length filled with zeros.
24-31
: Verify the impact of replacing the importedzeros
function.The local implementation of
zeros
replaces the previously imported function from '@ethereumjs/util'. While the implementation looks correct, we should verify that it maintains the same behavior as the original function across the codebase.Run the following script to check for any discrepancies in usage:
If these tests return results, we may need to review those occurrences to ensure compatibility with the new implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Impact of Replacing the
zeros
Function Verified Successfully
- All
zeros
function calls across the codebase use a single numeric argument, maintaining expected behavior.- No remaining imports of
zeros
from@ethereumjs/util
were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any unusual usage of the 'zeros' function that might be affected by the new implementation. # Test 1: Search for 'zeros' function calls with arguments other than a single number rg --type javascript --type typescript 'zeros\([^)]*[^0-9,\s][^)]*\)' -g '!**/node_modules/**' # Test 2: Search for any imports of 'zeros' from '@ethereumjs/util' that might have been missed rg --type javascript --type typescript "import.*zeros.*from '@ethereumjs/util'" -g '!**/node_modules/**'Length of output: 279
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any unusual usage of the 'zeros' function that might be affected by the new implementation. # Test 1: Search for 'zeros' function calls with arguments other than a single number rg --type js --type ts 'zeros\([^)]*[^0-9,\s][^)]*\)' -g '!**/node_modules/**' # Test 2: Search for any imports of 'zeros' from '@ethereumjs/util' that might have been missed rg --type js --type ts "import.*zeros.*from '@ethereumjs/util'" -g '!**/node_modules/**'Length of output: 491
packages/state/src/StateManager.ts (2)
6-6
: Verify compatibility of the new StateManagerInterface.While the change from
EvmStateManagerInterface
toStateManagerInterface
looks straightforward, it's crucial to ensure that the new interface provides all the necessary methods and properties that were available in the previous interface.Please confirm that:
- All methods and properties previously defined in
EvmStateManagerInterface
are present inStateManagerInterface
.- Any code that relied on
EvmStateManagerInterface
remains compatible withStateManagerInterface
.Consider running thorough tests to catch any potential type mismatches or missing methods.
1-1
: LGTM! Verify usage of new interface across the codebase.The change from
EvmStateManagerInterface
toStateManagerInterface
looks good. The import statement and interface extension are correctly updated.To ensure a smooth transition, let's verify that there are no remaining references to
EvmStateManagerInterface
in the codebase:Also applies to: 6-6
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No remaining references to
EvmStateManagerInterface
The usage of
StateManagerInterface
has been confirmed across the codebase, and there are no lingering references to the deprecatedEvmStateManagerInterface
.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to EvmStateManagerInterface # Test: Search for EvmStateManagerInterface. Expect: No results rg --type typescript "EvmStateManagerInterface" # Test: Confirm StateManagerInterface is now used. Expect: At least one result rg --type typescript "StateManagerInterface"Length of output: 162
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to EvmStateManagerInterface # Test: Search for EvmStateManagerInterface in .ts files. Expect: No results rg -g "*.ts" "EvmStateManagerInterface" # Test: Confirm StateManagerInterface is now used in .ts files. Expect: At least one result rg -g "*.ts" "StateManagerInterface"Length of output: 349
packages/address/src/create2ContractAddress.spec.ts (1)
24-24
: LGTM! Consistent with previous change.This update to the
EthjsAddress
instantiation is consistent with the change in the first test case. It maintains uniformity in the codebase.packages/address/src/createContractAddress.spec.ts (2)
1-9
: LGTM: Import changes and unchanged parts are correct.The changes to the import statements, specifically removing
EthjsAddress
and addinghexToBytes
from 'viem', are consistent with the updates in address creation. The rest of the file structure and unchanged parts remain correct.Also applies to: 11-20, 22-37
21-21
: LGTM: Address creation updated consistently.The
from
address creation in this test case has been updated in the same manner as the previous test, usingnew Address(hexToBytes(...))
. This change maintains consistency across the test file and aligns with the new address creation pattern.packages/rlp/package.json (1)
66-66
:⚠️ Potential issueCaution: Upgrading to an alpha version of @ethereumjs/rlp
The dependency on @ethereumjs/rlp has been updated from ^5.0.2 to 6.0.0-alpha.1. This is a significant change from a stable version to an alpha release, which may introduce breaking changes or unstable features.
Please ensure that:
- This upgrade is intentional and necessary.
- The changes in the alpha version are compatible with your codebase.
- You have thoroughly tested the integration with this new version.
Consider adding a comment in the PR description explaining the rationale behind this upgrade and confirming that it has been tested.
To verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
packages/common/package.json (1)
66-66
: Significant upgrade to @ethereumjs/common alpha versionThe upgrade from
"@ethereumjs/common": "^4.4.0"
to"@ethereumjs/common": "5.0.0-alpha.1"
is a substantial change that aligns with the PR's objective to upgrade to ethereumjs alpha.1. However, this introduces some considerations:
- Alpha versions may contain breaking changes and unstable features. Ensure thorough testing of all functionalities that depend on @ethereumjs/common.
- Document any breaking changes or new features introduced by this upgrade in your PR description or relevant documentation.
- Consider adding a comment in the package.json file explaining the reason for using this specific alpha version.
To ensure consistency across the monorepo, let's check if other packages have been similarly updated:
This will help verify if the upgrade has been consistently applied across the monorepo.
✅ Verification successful
Upgrade Consistent Across Monorepo
Verified that the
@ethereumjs/common
dependency has been consistently updated to"5.0.0-alpha.1"
in bothpackages/tx/package.json
andpackages/common/package.json
. No further instances of this dependency were found, ensuring consistency across the monorepo.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for @ethereumjs/common versions across all package.json files # Find all package.json files and grep for @ethereumjs/common fd --type file --glob 'package.json' --exec grep -H '@ethereumjs/common' {} \;Length of output: 221
packages/utils/package.json (2)
Line range hint
1-3
: Version update looks good.The version has been correctly incremented to 1.0.0-next.118, following semantic versioning principles and indicating a pre-release version.
66-67
: Caution: Upgrading to alpha versions of dependencies.The updates to @ethereumjs/evm (4.0.0-alpha.1) and @ethereumjs/util (10.0.0-alpha.1) are significant changes:
- Both are alpha releases, which may introduce instability or breaking changes.
- The major version increments suggest breaking changes in both libraries.
Please ensure that:
- These updates are intentional and align with the project's stability requirements.
- Comprehensive testing is performed to verify compatibility with the new versions.
- Any breaking changes are addressed throughout the codebase.
Run the following script to check for potential breaking changes:
Review the output to identify any code that might be affected by the breaking changes in these new versions.
packages/evm/package.json (1)
66-66
: Caution: Major update to @ethereumjs/evm to an alpha versionThe dependency on @ethereumjs/evm has been updated from ^3.1.1 to 4.0.0-alpha.1. This is a significant change that warrants careful consideration:
- Alpha versions are typically not stable and may contain breaking changes or bugs.
- This update may require modifications to the codebase to accommodate any API changes.
- Thorough testing is crucial to ensure compatibility and stability.
To assess the impact of this change, please run the following script:
Please review the script output to identify potential breaking changes and areas that may need updates in your codebase.
packages/tx/package.json (1)
71-71
: Caution: Major version upgrade to alpha release for @ethereumjs/commonThe devDependency @ethereumjs/common has been updated from ^4.4.0 to 5.0.0-alpha.1. This is a significant version jump and a move to an alpha release.
Please ensure that:
- The new version is compatible with your development environment.
- You've reviewed the changelog for any breaking changes.
- You're aware of the potential instability of an alpha release.
packages/evm/docs/interfaces/InterpreterStep.md (1)
139-139
: LGTM. Verify impact and update related docs if needed.The change from
EVMStateManagerInterface
toStateManagerInterface
looks good and aligns with the PR objective. However, please ensure the following:
- Verify that all other parts of the codebase that use the
InterpreterStep
interface have been updated accordingly.- Update any related documentation or comments that might still reference the old
EVMStateManagerInterface
.To help verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
This will help identify any places where updates might be needed due to this interface change.
✅ Verification successful
Verified. No remaining references to
EVMStateManagerInterface
were found. The usages ofInterpreterStep
are consistent with the newStateManagerInterface
.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to EVMStateManagerInterface rg "EVMStateManagerInterface" --type ts --type tsx --type js --type jsx # Search for uses of InterpreterStep to ensure they're compatible with the new StateManagerInterface rg "InterpreterStep" --type ts --type tsx --type js --type jsx -A 10 -B 10Length of output: 202
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to EVMStateManagerInterface rg "EVMStateManagerInterface" --type ts --type js --type jsx --glob "*.tsx" # Search for uses of InterpreterStep to ensure they're compatible with the new StateManagerInterface rg "InterpreterStep" --type ts --type js --type jsx --glob "*.tsx" -A 10 -B 10Length of output: 210
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to EVMStateManagerInterface rg "EVMStateManagerInterface" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.js" --glob "*.jsx" --glob "*.tsx" # Search for uses of InterpreterStep to ensure they're compatible with the new StateManagerInterface rg "InterpreterStep" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.js" --glob "*.jsx" --glob "*.tsx" -A 10 -B 10Length of output: 1014
packages/state/package.json (2)
Line range hint
2-2
: Consider updating the package versionThe package version remains at 1.0.0-next.124 despite the significant dependency update.
Please confirm if the package version should be incremented. Typically, updating to a new major version of a dependency (even if it's an alpha) would warrant at least a minor version bump.
You can use the following script to check the current version and recent changes:
#!/bin/bash # Display current version jq '.version' packages/state/package.json # Show recent commits affecting this package git log -n 5 --oneline -- packages/state/If you decide to update the version, don't forget to update it in other relevant files and commit messages as well.
66-66
:⚠️ Potential issueVerify compatibility with the alpha version of @ethereumjs/statemanager
The dependency @ethereumjs/statemanager has been updated from ^2.4.0 to 3.0.0-alpha.1. This is a significant change as it moves to an alpha version of a major release.
Please ensure that:
- The new version is compatible with the current codebase.
- Any breaking changes in the alpha version have been addressed.
- The decision to use an alpha version in a production dependency has been carefully considered.
You may want to run the following script to check for any usage of deprecated or changed APIs:
Consider adding a comment in the package.json file explaining the reason for using an alpha version, to inform other developers and for future reference.
✅ Verification successful
@ethereumjs/statemanager Upgrade Verified
The dependency
@ethereumjs/statemanager
has been successfully updated to version3.0.0-alpha.1
and is actively utilized within the codebase. No deprecated or incompatible API usages were detected during the verification process.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of @ethereumjs/statemanager in the codebase rg --type typescript --type javascript '@ethereumjs/statemanager' -C 5Length of output: 239
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for deprecated or changed APIs in @ethereumjs/statemanager after the upgrade ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'import { $_ } from "@ethereumjs/statemanager"'Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to 'statemanager' in the codebase rg 'statemanager' --type typescript --type javascript --type markdown --type json -C 3Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to 'statemanager' in the codebase using file extensions rg 'statemanager' -g '*.ts' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.md' -g '*.json' -C 3Length of output: 103063
packages/utils/src/index.ts (1)
118-118
: Approve the type export renaming with backward compatibility.The change from
JsonRpcWithdrawal
toJSONRPCWithdrawal as JsonRpcWithdrawal
is a good practice. It standardizes the JSON acronym to all uppercase while maintaining backward compatibility through the alias. This approach ensures that existing code usingJsonRpcWithdrawal
will continue to work without breaking changes.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any inconsistencies, let's verify the usage of both
JSONRPCWithdrawal
andJsonRpcWithdrawal
in the codebase:This will help us identify if there are any places where the old naming is still in use and might need updating.
✅ Verification successful
[/run_scripts]
Verified:
shallowCopy
Return Type Change SafeThe
shallowCopy
method's return type has been successfully updated toStateManagerInterface
. The search results indicate no existing code references or type assertions usingEvmStateManagerInterface
, ensuring that this modification does not introduce any breaking changes to the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for uses of shallowCopy method echo "Searching for uses of shallowCopy method:" rg "\.shallowCopy\(" --type ts # Search for type assertions related to EvmStateManagerInterface echo "Searching for type assertions related to EvmStateManagerInterface:" rg "as EvmStateManagerInterface" --type tsLength of output: 31185
packages/state/docs/interfaces/StateManager.md (7)
67-67
: LGTM: VerifyoriginalStorageCache
property definitionThe
originalStorageCache
property is now correctly inherited fromStateManagerInterface
. This change is consistent with the updated interface extension.To ensure the property definition remains consistent:
#!/bin/bash # Compare originalStorageCache definition in StateManagerInterface and EVMStateManagerInterface echo "StateManagerInterface originalStorageCache definition:" rg --type typescript -A 5 "interface StateManagerInterface" | rg "originalStorageCache" echo "EVMStateManagerInterface originalStorageCache definition:" rg --type typescript -A 5 "interface EVMStateManagerInterface" | rg "originalStorageCache"Please review the results to confirm that the property definition remains unchanged.
105-105
: LGTM: Verify method signatures and behaviorsMultiple methods are now correctly inherited from
StateManagerInterface
. This change is consistent with the updated interface extension.To ensure all method signatures and behaviors remain consistent:
#!/bin/bash # Compare method signatures in StateManagerInterface and EVMStateManagerInterface methods=( "checkChunkWitnessPresent" "checkpoint" "clearContractStorage" "commit" "deleteAccount" "dumpStorage" "dumpStorageRange" "generateCanonicalGenesis" "getAccount" "getAppliedKey" "getContractCode" "getContractCodeSize" "getContractStorage" "getProof" "getStateRoot" "hasStateRoot" "modifyAccountFields" "putAccount" "putContractCode" "putContractStorage" "revert" "setStateRoot" ) for method in "${methods[@]}"; do echo "Comparing $method:" echo "StateManagerInterface:" rg --type typescript "interface StateManagerInterface" -A 50 | rg "$method" echo "EVMStateManagerInterface:" rg --type typescript "interface EVMStateManagerInterface" -A 50 | rg "$method" echo "---" donePlease review the results to confirm that all method signatures and behaviors remain unchanged.
Also applies to: 123-123, 161-161, 191-191, 229-229, 267-267, 293-293, 315-315, 337-337, 359-359, 381-381, 403-403, 427-427, 451-451, 469-469, 491-491, 515-515, 539-539, 563-563, 589-589, 607-607, 656-656
Line range hint
1-678
: Comprehensive verification needed forStateManager
interface changesThe
StateManager
interface has undergone significant changes, transitioning from extendingEVMStateManagerInterface
toStateManagerInterface
. While the changes appear consistent, a comprehensive verification is necessary to ensure no breaking changes or inconsistencies are introduced.To ensure the integrity of the codebase:
- Verify all usages of
StateManager
andEVMStateManagerInterface
:#!/bin/bash echo "Searching for StateManager usage:" rg --type typescript "StateManager" echo "Searching for EVMStateManagerInterface usage:" rg --type typescript "EVMStateManagerInterface"
- Check for any remaining references to
EVMStateManagerInterface
that should be updated:#!/bin/bash echo "Checking for remaining EVMStateManagerInterface references:" rg --type typescript "EVMStateManagerInterface"
- Verify that all tests related to
StateManager
still pass:#!/bin/bash echo "Running tests related to StateManager:" npm test -- -t "StateManager"Please review the results of these checks and ensure that all necessary updates have been made throughout the codebase. Consider updating documentation and migration guides if this change affects public APIs.
11-11
: Verify compatibility with the newStateManagerInterface
The
StateManager
interface now extendsStateManagerInterface
instead ofEVMStateManagerInterface
. This change might have a significant impact on the codebase.To ensure this change doesn't introduce breaking changes or inconsistencies:
Please review the results to ensure all relevant code has been updated to use
StateManagerInterface
.✅ Verification successful
StateManagerInterface replacement verified
The
StateManagerInterface
has been correctly updated and there are no remaining references toEVMStateManagerInterface
in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of EVMStateManagerInterface and StateManagerInterface echo "Searching for EVMStateManagerInterface usage:" rg --type typescript "EVMStateManagerInterface" echo "Searching for StateManagerInterface usage:" rg --type typescript "StateManagerInterface"Length of output: 853
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of EVMStateManagerInterface and StateManagerInterface in TypeScript files echo "Searching for EVMStateManagerInterface usage in .ts files:" rg "EVMStateManagerInterface" --glob "*.ts" echo "Searching for StateManagerInterface usage in .ts files:" rg "StateManagerInterface" --glob "*.ts"Length of output: 605
666-666
: LGTM: Verify impact ofshallowCopy
return type changeThe
shallowCopy
method now correctly returnsStateManagerInterface
instead ofEVMStateManagerInterface
. This change is consistent with the updated interface extension.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact dependent code:
Please review the results to confirm that all usages of
shallowCopy
are compatible with the new return typeStateManagerInterface
.Also applies to: 674-674
✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Re-run
shallowCopy
Usage Search with Updated ScriptThe initial search for
shallowCopy
usages failed due to an unrecognized file typetypescript
. Please execute the updated script below to accurately locate all instances within.ts
and.tsx
files:This script specifically targets
.ts
and.tsx
files to ensure comprehensive coverage. After running, please review the results to confirm that all usages ofshallowCopy
are compatible with the updated return typeStateManagerInterface
.Also applies to: 674-674
Verified:
shallowCopy
return type change is safeAll usages of the
shallowCopy
method are within test files, ensuring that the change toStateManagerInterface
does not affect the production code.
packages/utils/src/createMemoryDb.spec.ts
packages/state/src/actions/shallowCopy.spec.ts
packages/blockchain/src/createChain.spec.ts
packages/blockchain/src/actions/shallowCopy.spec.ts
Please ensure that all tests pass successfully to confirm no unintended side effects.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of shallowCopy method echo "Searching for shallowCopy usage:" rg --type typescript "shallowCopy\("Length of output: 853
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of shallowCopy method in TypeScript files echo "Searching for shallowCopy usage in TypeScript files:" rg "shallowCopy\(" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 515
678-678
: LGTM: VerifyshallowCopy
method definitionThe
shallowCopy
method is now correctly inherited fromStateManagerInterface
. This change is consistent with the updated interface extension.To ensure the method definition remains consistent:
Please review the results to confirm that the method definition remains unchanged.
191-191
: Verify thecommit
method overrideThe
commit
method now explicitly overrides the method fromStateManagerInterface
. This suggests a custom implementation inStateManager
.To ensure this override is intentional and correctly implemented:
Please review the results to confirm that the override is intentional and that the implementation in
StateManager
is correct and doesn't break any expected behavior defined inStateManagerInterface
.packages/common/docs/globals.md (2)
Line range hint
1-420
: Overall assessment: Documentation update is minimal and accurateThe changes in this file are limited to renaming the
EvmStateManagerInterface
toStateManagerInterface
. This modification is consistent with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. The rest of the documentation remains unchanged, which is appropriate given the focused nature of this update.
15-15
: Interface renamed: Verify impact on dependent codeThe interface
EvmStateManagerInterface
has been renamed toStateManagerInterface
. This change aligns with the information provided in the AI-generated summary.While the new name is more generic and potentially indicates a broader scope, please ensure that:
- All references to this interface throughout the codebase have been updated.
- The change is documented in the changelog or release notes.
- Any external dependencies or documentation referencing the old interface name are updated.
To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
This will help identify any places where the old interface name might still be in use or where the new interface name has been introduced.
tevm/docs/common/README.md (1)
19-19
: Approve interface rename and suggest verification.The renaming of
EvmStateManagerInterface
toStateManagerInterface
looks good. This change likely improves clarity and aligns with naming conventions.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any breaking changes or inconsistencies, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old interface name:
This will help verify that the rename has been consistently applied across the codebase and that any necessary imports have been updated.
✅ Verification successful
Interface rename verified successfully.
All references to
EvmStateManagerInterface
have been removed, and the newStateManagerInterface
is correctly imported inpackages/state/src/StateManager.ts
.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to EvmStateManagerInterface # Search for EvmStateManagerInterface in all files rg --type-not md "EvmStateManagerInterface" # Check if there are any TypeScript files that import StateManagerInterface rg --type typescript "import.*StateManagerInterface"Length of output: 133
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all available file types in ripgrep to verify correct type name for TypeScript files rg --type-listLength of output: 4821
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to EvmStateManagerInterface and verify imports of StateManagerInterface in TypeScript files # Search for any remaining references to EvmStateManagerInterface in all files except markdown rg --type-not md "EvmStateManagerInterface" # Check if there are any TypeScript files that import StateManagerInterface using the correct types rg --type ts --type tsx "import.*StateManagerInterface"Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to EvmStateManagerInterface and verify imports of StateManagerInterface in TypeScript files using glob patterns # Search for any remaining references to EvmStateManagerInterface in all files except markdown rg --type-not md "EvmStateManagerInterface" # Check if there are any TypeScript files that import StateManagerInterface using glob patterns rg --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" "import.*StateManagerInterface"Length of output: 202
tevm/docs/state/interfaces/StateManager.md (4)
67-68
: Approved: Property inheritance updatedThe
originalStorageCache
property is now correctly inherited fromStateManagerInterface
, which is consistent with the interface extension change.
666-666
: Approved: shallowCopy return type updatedThe
shallowCopy
method's return type has been correctly updated toStateManagerInterface
, which is consistent with the interface extension change.Also applies to: 674-674
105-105
: Approved: Method inheritances updated consistentlyAll inherited methods now correctly reference
StateManagerInterface
instead ofEvmStateManagerInterface
. This change is consistent with the interface extension update and maintains the integrity of the interface structure.To ensure all method inheritances have been updated correctly, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining method inheritances from EvmStateManagerInterface ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'interface StateManager extends StateManagerInterface { $$$ $_: $_ $$$ }' tevm/docs/state/interfaces/StateManager.mdAlso applies to: 123-123, 161-161, 191-191, 229-229, 267-267, 293-293, 315-315, 337-337, 359-359, 381-381, 403-403, 427-427, 451-451, 469-469, 491-491, 515-515, 539-539, 563-563, 589-589, 607-607, 656-656, 678-678
11-11
: Approved: Interface extension updatedThe
StateManager
interface now extendsStateManagerInterface
instead ofEvmStateManagerInterface
. This change appears to be part of a broader refactoring or update to the state management system.To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to
EvmStateManagerInterface
that might need updating:
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ export type { Common } from './Common.js' | |||
export { | |||
type CustomCrypto, | |||
type StorageDump, | |||
type EVMStateManagerInterface as EvmStateManagerInterface, | |||
type StateManagerInterface as StateManagerInterface, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove redundant rename of StateManagerInterface
.
The export statement type StateManagerInterface as StateManagerInterface
in packages/common/src/index.ts
is redundant and can be simplified.
-
File:
packages/common/src/index.ts
- Line: 8
- type StateManagerInterface as StateManagerInterface, + type StateManagerInterface,
🔗 Analysis chain
Remove redundant rename and verify impact of interface renaming.
The renaming of StateManagerInterface as StateManagerInterface
is redundant and can be simplified. Additionally, the change from EVMStateManagerInterface
to StateManagerInterface
might affect other parts of the codebase.
- Remove the redundant rename:
- type StateManagerInterface as StateManagerInterface,
+ type StateManagerInterface,
- Verify the impact of renaming
EVMStateManagerInterface
toStateManagerInterface
:
Please review the script output to ensure that:
- There are no remaining references to
EVMStateManagerInterface
. - All occurrences of
StateManagerInterface
are intentional and correct.
If any inconsistencies are found, please update the relevant files accordingly.
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { create2ContractAddress } from './create2ContractAddress.js' | |||
|
|||
describe('create2ContractAddress', () => { | |||
it('should create a valid contract address using CREATE2', () => { | |||
const from = EthjsAddress.fromString(`0x${'11'.repeat(20)}`) | |||
const from = new EthjsAddress(hexToBytes(`0x${'11'.repeat(20)}`)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Remaining instances of EthjsAddress.fromString
found.
Multiple files still utilize EthjsAddress.fromString
, indicating that the update is not fully applied. Please ensure all instances are refactored to maintain consistency.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify similar changes across the codebase.
The update to the EthjsAddress
instantiation looks good. It uses the constructor directly with hexToBytes
, which is a more straightforward approach.
To ensure consistency, let's verify if similar changes have been made throughout the codebase:
Action Required: Update the search command to correctly target TypeScript files.
Action Required: Update the search command to target .ts
and .tsx
files using glob patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of EthjsAddress.fromString
# Expect: No results, indicating all instances have been updated
rg --type typescript "EthjsAddress\.fromString"
Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of EthjsAddress.fromString in .ts and .tsx files
# Expect: No results, indicating all instances have been updated
rg "EthjsAddress\.fromString" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts -t tsx
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of EthjsAddress.fromString in .ts and .tsx files
# Expect: No results, indicating all instances have been updated
rg "EthjsAddress\.fromString" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"
Length of output: 15386
import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest' | ||
import { Address } from './Address.js' | ||
import { createContractAddress } from './createContractAddress.js' | ||
|
||
describe('createContractAddress', () => { | ||
it('should create a valid contract address with nonce 0', () => { | ||
const from = EthjsAddress.fromString(`0x${'11'.repeat(20)}`) | ||
const from = new Address(hexToBytes(`0x${'11'.repeat(20)}`)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
While the update to use new Address(hexToBytes(...))
in createContractAddress.spec.ts
is correct, multiple instances of EthjsAddress
remain throughout the codebase. This inconsistency could lead to potential confusion and errors.
Areas to Address:
- Migration Plan: Develop a strategy to systematically replace
EthjsAddress
with the newAddress
constructor across all packages. - Code Review: Ensure that future updates adhere to the new address implementation to maintain consistency.
- Testing: Update existing tests to reflect the changes and verify that all address-related functionalities remain intact.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Address creation updated correctly.
The from
address creation has been properly updated to use the new Address
constructor with hexToBytes
. This change is consistent with the updated imports and maintains the test's original intent.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify the usage of this new address creation pattern:
To address the issue with unrecognized file types, let's search for .ts
and .tsx
files directly:
To ensure all instances of EthjsAddress
have been appropriately updated, let's identify their exact locations and contexts:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new Address creation pattern across the codebase.
# Test: Search for new Address creation pattern
rg --type typescript 'new Address\(hexToBytes\(' packages/
# Test: Search for any remaining usage of EthjsAddress
rg --type typescript 'EthjsAddress' packages/
Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new Address creation pattern across the codebase by searching .ts and .tsx files.
# Test: Search for new Address creation pattern in .ts and .tsx files
rg 'new Address\(hexToBytes\(' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' packages/
# Test: Search for any remaining usage of EthjsAddress in .ts and .tsx files
rg 'EthjsAddress' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' packages/
Length of output: 27517
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate all instances of EthjsAddress and determine their contexts.
# Search for EthjsAddress usages in .ts and .tsx files
rg 'EthjsAddress' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' packages/
Length of output: 27126
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ | |||
"typecheck": "tsc --noEmit" | |||
}, | |||
"dependencies": { | |||
"@ethereumjs/evm": "^3.1.1" | |||
"@ethereumjs/evm": "4.0.0-alpha.1" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Dependency Upgrade Impacts Multiple Areas
The @ethereumjs/evm
dependency is extensively used throughout the codebase, as identified in numerous files across various packages. Upgrading from ^3.1.1
to 4.0.0-alpha.1
introduces potential risks due to it being an alpha release, which may include breaking changes and instability.
Recommendations:
- Review Usage: Examine all instances where
@ethereumjs/evm
is imported and utilized to ensure compatibility with the new version. - Consult Release Notes: Check the
@ethereumjs/[email protected]
release notes for any breaking changes or deprecated features. - Comprehensive Testing: Implement thorough testing across the affected modules to validate that the upgrade does not introduce regressions or new issues.
- Consider Stability: Evaluate whether using an alpha version aligns with the project's stability requirements, especially for production environments.
🔗 Analysis chain
Significant dependency update to alpha version
The @ethereumjs/evm
dependency has been updated from ^3.1.1
to 4.0.0-alpha.1
. This is a major version jump to an alpha release, which aligns with the PR objective but introduces some considerations:
- Alpha versions may contain breaking changes and unstable features.
- They are typically not recommended for production use without thorough testing.
- This update may require changes in how the library is used throughout the codebase.
To assess the impact of this change, please run the following script:
Please ensure that:
- All areas of the codebase using
@ethereumjs/evm
have been updated and tested with the new version. - The changelog or release notes for
@ethereumjs/[email protected]
have been reviewed for breaking changes. - Comprehensive tests are in place to verify the functionality with the new version.
Could you provide more information on the motivation for upgrading to this alpha version? Are there specific features or fixes in this version that are required for the project?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of @ethereumjs/evm across the codebase
# Search for import statements or require calls
echo "Searching for @ethereumjs/evm usage:"
rg --type typescript --type javascript "from\s+['\"]@ethereumjs/evm['\"]|require\(['\"]@ethereumjs/evm['\"]\)"
# Search for specific EVM-related classes or methods that might have changed
echo "Searching for potential breaking changes:"
rg --type typescript --type javascript "new\s+EVM\b|\bEVM\.\w+\b|\bevm\.\w+\b"
Length of output: 447
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of @ethereumjs/evm across the codebase
# Search for import statements or require calls
echo "Searching for @ethereumjs/evm usage:"
rg "from\s+['\"]@ethereumjs/evm['\"]|require\(['\"]@ethereumjs/evm['\"]\)" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.js"
# Search for specific EVM-related classes or methods that might have changed
echo "Searching for potential breaking changes:"
rg "new\s+EVM\b|\bEVM\.\w+\b|\bevm\.\w+\b" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.js"
Length of output: 34181
@@ -63,12 +63,12 @@ | |||
"typecheck": "tsc --noEmit" | |||
}, | |||
"dependencies": { | |||
"@ethereumjs/tx": "^5.4.0", | |||
"@ethereumjs/tx": "6.0.0-alpha.1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Caution: Updating to @ethereumjs/tx version 6.0.0-alpha.1
The dependency @ethereumjs/tx
is actively used across multiple files in the codebase. Upgrading to version 6.0.0-alpha.1
, an alpha release, may introduce breaking changes or unstable features.
- Ensure compatibility by thoroughly testing the updated dependency within your environment.
- Reach out to the maintainers or consult the repository for any available release notes or migration guides to understand potential impacts.
- Consider the risks associated with using an alpha version in a production environment.
🔗 Analysis chain
Caution: Major version upgrade to alpha release for @ethereumjs/tx
The dependency @ethereumjs/tx has been updated from ^5.4.0 to 6.0.0-alpha.1. This represents a significant version jump and a move to an alpha release.
Please ensure that:
- The new version is compatible with your codebase.
- You've reviewed the changelog for any breaking changes.
- You're aware of the potential instability of an alpha release.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of @ethereumjs/tx in the codebase and look for potential breaking changes
# Test: Search for imports of @ethereumjs/tx
echo "Searching for imports of @ethereumjs/tx:"
rg --type typescript "from ['\"]\@ethereumjs/tx['\"]" -A 5
# Test: Check if there's a CHANGELOG.md in the @ethereumjs/tx package
echo "Checking for CHANGELOG.md in @ethereumjs/tx package:"
cat node_modules/@ethereumjs/tx/CHANGELOG.md 2>/dev/null || echo "CHANGELOG.md not found"
Length of output: 504
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of @ethereumjs/tx in the codebase and look for potential breaking changes
# Test: Search for imports of @ethereumjs/tx
echo "Searching for imports of @ethereumjs/tx:"
rg --type typescript "from ['\"]@ethereumjs/tx['\"]" -A 5
# Test: Check if there's a CHANGELOG.md in the @ethereumjs/tx package
echo "Checking for CHANGELOG.md in @ethereumjs/tx package:"
cat node_modules/@ethereumjs/tx/CHANGELOG.md 2>/dev/null || echo "CHANGELOG.md not found"
Length of output: 406
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of @ethereumjs/tx in the codebase and look for potential breaking changes
# Test: Search for imports of @ethereumjs/tx in TypeScript and JavaScript files
echo "Searching for imports of @ethereumjs/tx:"
rg "from ['\"]@ethereumjs/tx['\"]" -A 5
# Test: Check if there's a CHANGELOG.md in the @ethereumjs/tx package
echo "Checking for CHANGELOG.md in @ethereumjs/tx package:"
cat node_modules/@ethereumjs/tx/CHANGELOG.md 2>/dev/null || echo "CHANGELOG.md not found"
Length of output: 2008
bb0ffd9
to
896092c
Compare
Description
Concise description of proposed changes
Testing
Explain the quality checks that have been done on the code changes
Additional Information
Your ENS/address:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
zeros
to create aUint8Array
filled with zeros.Updates
EvmStateManagerInterface
toStateManagerInterface
across multiple packages for clarity.Bug Fixes
Documentation