Update rpc-providers.mdx #1159
Update rpc-providers.mdx #1159
Conversation
added blockjoy and fixed formatting for drpc and getblock
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@krofax has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new section for "BlockJoy" in the RPC & Node providers documentation. This section provides a detailed description of BlockJoy's services, emphasizing its focus on fast, dedicated, unmetered blockchain nodes hosted on bare metal, along with a one-click deployment option for fully synced OP archive nodes. It specifies the supported networks, including OP Mainnet and OP Sepolia, and outlines the compatible clients (reth, geth, and erigon). Additionally, the formatting of the "Supported Networks" sections for the existing providers "dRPC" and "GetBlock" has been modified to include a header, enhancing consistency and clarity in presentation. The changes aim to improve the documentation by adding a new provider and standardizing the format for listing supported networks. Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pages/builders/tools/connect/rpc-providers.mdx (2)
61-62: Standardize client names and list formattingThe client names should be properly formatted and the list should follow the same style as other sections:
-* OP Mainnet ( reth, geth, and erigon clients ) -* OP Sepolia +* OP Mainnet (supports `reth`, `geth`, and `erigon` clients) +* OP Sepolia
Inconsistent header capitalization found
There are inconsistencies in the capitalization of "Supported Networks" headers:
- Most sections use "Supported networks" (lowercase 'networks')
- dRPC and GetBlock sections use "Supported Networks" (uppercase 'Networks')
The document should maintain consistent header capitalization. The predominant style is lowercase "networks", so the headers in the dRPC and GetBlock sections should be updated to match.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-150: Verify header case consistency throughout the documentLet's check if other sections in the document have similar header capitalization issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistent header cases in the document # Search for all H3 headers and their cases echo "Checking H3 header consistency..." rg "^### Supported [Nn]etworks" pages/builders/tools/connect/rpc-providers.mdxLength of output: 387
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check all H2 and H3 headers in the document for case consistency echo "Checking all H2 and H3 headers..." rg "^##[#]? .*" pages/builders/tools/connect/rpc-providers.mdxLength of output: 801
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/builders/tools/connect/rpc-providers.mdx(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/builders/tools/connect/rpc-providers.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
added blockjoy and fixed formatting for drpc and getblock
Description
Tests
Additional context
Metadata