Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Complex Particle Model + Breakups #103

Merged
merged 83 commits into from
Feb 15, 2022
Merged

Complex Particle Model + Breakups #103

merged 83 commits into from
Feb 15, 2022

Conversation

FG-TUM
Copy link
Collaborator

@FG-TUM FG-TUM commented Feb 1, 2022

Description

  • Restore integration test -> needs Quickly deorbiting Particles #100 to be resolved first
  • Resolve TODOs in default_cfg.yaml
  • Link to propagator version that uses table based atmospheric density

Related Pull Requests

Combines:

Resolved Issues

All the issues resolved in the PRs above

How Has This Been Tested?

  • 1 month simulation compared against SGP4

 - enum in Particle class
 - update all constructor calls
This now points to a branch. Will need update as soon as it is merged.
  - BreakupWrapper to wrap all interaction with the external code
  - new input parameter
  - new timer to measure time spent in breakups
  - new test
@FG-TUM FG-TUM force-pushed the mergeBranch branch 3 times, most recently from e8cb84a to cc1e4bc Compare February 14, 2022 19:10
    - made name of expected output file a input var
    - validation script also gives positive feedback
    - add git-lfs to CI
reactivated validation tests with new reference

    - made name of expected output file a input var
    - validation script also gives positive feedback
    - add git-lfs to CI
@FG-TUM FG-TUM requested a review from gomezzz February 15, 2022 01:19
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
cfg/default_cfg.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cfg/default_cfg.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
cfg/testValidation.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/data/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/validationtest.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@FG-TUM FG-TUM requested a review from gomezzz February 15, 2022 18:57
@FG-TUM FG-TUM merged commit 08fce77 into main Feb 15, 2022
@FG-TUM FG-TUM deleted the mergeBranch branch February 15, 2022 21:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants