refact: use getComponent when getting 1 comp

[asmfstatoil]

No description provided.

[EvenSol]

Yes support this. Could it be that computational speed is affected?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 35.94616% with 809 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 39.59%. Comparing base (d3bdf14) to head (1b7b70c).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...c/main/java/neqsim/thermo/system/SystemThermo.java	44.00%	42 Missing ⚠️
...ndary/reactivefilmmodel/ReactiveFluidBoundary.java	0.00%	37 Missing ⚠️
...ops/saturationops/BubblePointPressureFlashDer.java	0.00%	35 Missing ⚠️
.../java/neqsim/thermo/mixingrule/EosMixingRules.java	33.33%	26 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
...thermodynamicoperations/flashops/TPmultiflash.java	37.25%	30 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...ops/saturationops/DewPointTemperatureFlashDer.java	0.00%	32 Missing ⚠️
...qsim/mathlib/nonlinearsolver/SysNewtonRhapson.java	0.00%	26 Missing ⚠️
.../multicomponentenvelopeops/PTphaseEnvelopeMay.java	0.00%	26 Missing ⚠️
...perations/flashops/SysNewtonRhapsonTPflashNew.java	0.00%	23 Missing ⚠️
...ermodynamicoperations/flashops/TPmultiflash_1.java	0.00%	23 Missing ⚠️
... and 73 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #1187   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     39.59%   39.59%           
  Complexity     5869     5869           
=========================================
  Files           717      717           
  Lines         69748    69702   -46     
  Branches       8123     8117    -6     
=========================================
- Hits          27616    27598   -18     
+ Misses        40471    40443   -28     
  Partials       1661     1661           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

[asmfstatoil]

Yes support this. Could it be that computational speed is affected?

Not sure if Java JIT optimizer already handles this. But is probably faster when debugging.

[EvenSol]

Yes support this. Could it be that computational speed is affected?

Not sure if Java JIT optimizer already handles this. But is probably faster when debugging.

It seems like the tests are running at the same speed - so propably this is just fine (and with no significant perfomrance change).

I suggest we merge this.