-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: Add ert simulation mode to object metadata #867
Conversation
8644c6f
to
95c47f1
Compare
The simulation mode should allow contextual inference about the type of ensemble this data is derived from.
95c47f1
to
d9ce6ec
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some comments to consider, otherwise LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to go 🚀
@@ -406,3 +407,20 @@ def test_fmuprovider_workflow_reference(fmurun_w_casemetadata, globalconfig2): | |||
pydantic.ValidationError, match="Input should be a valid string" | |||
): | |||
FmuProvider(model=GLOBAL_CONFIG_MODEL, workflow=123.4).get_metadata() | |||
|
|||
|
|||
def test_ert_simulation_modes_one_to_one() -> None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was getting ready to make a comment about them coming out of sync 😅 happy to find this test here at the bottom 👍
Resolves #804
Resolves #690 (more or less)
Resolves #263
The simulation mode should allow contextual inference about the type of ensemble this data is derived from.