Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pin policies used by RHTAP Multi-CI #153

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

simonbaird
Copy link
Member

With the imminent GA of RHTAP 1.3, let's pin this reference for stability. I pushed the branch to ec-policies just now on sha 158a9858c7be2250cd1ec8e7b80c7dca0d8ca01d .

It means that changes from EC-1032 didn't get merged in time, but that's okay, we'll include them in future RHTAP releases.

I considered introducing an RHTAP version number in the branch name, e.g. release-v0.5-rhtap-1.3 but decided against it, though we may want to do somethinhg like that in future.

Ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/EC-1029

With the imminent GA of RHTAP 1.3, let's pin this reference for
stability. I pushed the branch to ec-policies just now on
sha 158a9858c7be2250cd1ec8e7b80c7dca0d8ca01d .

It means that changes from EC-1032 didn't get merged in time, but
that's okay, we'll include them in future RHTAP releases.

I considered introducing an RHTAP version number in the branch name,
e.g. `release-v0.5-rhtap-1.3` but decided against it, though we may
want to do somethinhg like that in future.

Ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/EC-1029
@simonbaird simonbaird merged commit ebf05b4 into enterprise-contract:main Dec 2, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants