Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
target/riscv: replace __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ with __func__
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The reasoning for the change:
* `__func__` is part of C99, `__PRETTY_FUNCTION__` is GNU extension.
* `__PRETTY_FUNCTION__` is defined to be the same as `__func__` for C
  sources by GCC documentation but differ for C++ sources (full
  signature instead of just a name).
* Currently Clang does support `__PRETTY_FUNCTION__`, though it uses
  GCC's C++ variant across C and C++.

Therefore using `__PRETTY_FUNCTION__` creates confusion and does not
provide any valueble information in the logs.

Change-Id: Ie0db6d73f602784b6752a30911dcef3dd7ee4594
  • Loading branch information
en-sc committed Nov 15, 2023
1 parent 3b0c654 commit 00320fd
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 5 additions and 6 deletions.
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions src/target/riscv/batch.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -215,13 +215,13 @@ static void dump_field(int idle, const struct scan_field *field)
unsigned int in_address = in >> DTM_DMI_ADDRESS_OFFSET;

log_printf_lf(LOG_LVL_DEBUG,
__FILE__, __LINE__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__,
__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__,
"%db %s %08x @%02x -> %s %08x @%02x; %di",
field->num_bits, op_string[out_op], out_data, out_address,
status_string[in_op], in_data, in_address, idle);
} else {
log_printf_lf(LOG_LVL_DEBUG,
__FILE__, __LINE__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, "%db %s %08x @%02x -> ?; %di",
__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__, "%db %s %08x @%02x -> ?; %di",
field->num_bits, op_string[out_op], out_data, out_address, idle);
}
}
Expand Down
7 changes: 3 additions & 4 deletions src/target/riscv/riscv-013.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -389,22 +389,21 @@ static void dump_field(struct target *target, int idle, const struct scan_field
unsigned int in_data = get_field(in, DTM_DMI_DATA);
unsigned int in_address = in >> DTM_DMI_ADDRESS_OFFSET;

log_printf_lf(LOG_LVL_DEBUG,
__FILE__, __LINE__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__,
log_printf_lf(LOG_LVL_DEBUG, __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__,
"%db %s %08x @%02x -> %s %08x @%02x; %di",
field->num_bits, op_string[out_op], out_data, out_address,
status_string[in_op], in_data, in_address, idle);

if (out_op == DTM_DMI_OP_WRITE) {
char out_decoded[decode_dmi(target, NULL, out_address, out_data) + 1];
decode_dmi(target, out_decoded, out_address, out_data);
log_printf_lf(LOG_LVL_DEBUG, __FILE__, __LINE__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__,
log_printf_lf(LOG_LVL_DEBUG, __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__,
"write: %s", out_decoded);
}
if (!discard_in && in_op == DTM_DMI_OP_SUCCESS) {
char in_decoded[decode_dmi(target, NULL, in_address, in_data) + 1];
decode_dmi(target, in_decoded, in_address, in_data);
log_printf_lf(LOG_LVL_DEBUG, __FILE__, __LINE__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__,
log_printf_lf(LOG_LVL_DEBUG, __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__,
"read: %s", in_decoded);
}
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 00320fd

Please sign in to comment.