Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve rolling upgrade order docs #2576

Merged

Conversation

DaveCTurner
Copy link
Contributor

The first point in the list (upgrade the master-ineligible nodes) is
redundant and sort of contradicts the second one (upgrade the data nodes
tier-by-tier). This commit drops it.

The second point had some redundant sentences in a somewhat awkward
order. This commit cleans that up.

There's no mention of nodes that are neither data nodes nor
master-eligible nodes. In fact it doesn't really matter when these nodes
are upgraded, but this commit specifies to upgrade them before the
master-eligible nodes for the sake of completeness.

Finally, there were some over-long lines so this commit reflows the
source.

The first point in the list (upgrade the master-ineligible nodes) is
redundant and sort of contradicts the second one (upgrade the data nodes
tier-by-tier). This commit drops it.

The second point had some redundant sentences in a somewhat awkward
order. This commit cleans that up.

There's no mention of nodes that are neither data nodes nor
master-eligible nodes. In fact it doesn't really matter when these nodes
are upgraded, but this commit specifies to upgrade them before the
master-eligible nodes for the sake of completeness.

Finally, there were some over-long lines so this commit reflows the
source.
@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner added v8.10 backport-8.10 Automated backport with mergify v8.11 backport-8.11 Automated backport with mergify v8.12 labels Oct 19, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Documentation preview:

@DaveCTurner
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure about the labelling policy in this repo but my intention is for this to go into the current live docs (8.10) and future versions (8.11 and beyond).

Copy link
Contributor

@abdonpijpelink abdonpijpelink left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great. Thanks @DaveCTurner !

@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner merged commit d401cda into elastic:main Oct 19, 2023
1 check passed
@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner deleted the 2023/10/19/rolling-upgrade-order branch October 19, 2023 15:01
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2023
The first point in the list (upgrade the master-ineligible nodes) is
redundant and sort of contradicts the second one (upgrade the data nodes
tier-by-tier). This commit drops it.

The second point had some redundant sentences in a somewhat awkward
order. This commit cleans that up.

There's no mention of nodes that are neither data nodes nor
master-eligible nodes. In fact it doesn't really matter when these nodes
are upgraded, but this commit specifies to upgrade them before the
master-eligible nodes for the sake of completeness.

Finally, there were some over-long lines so this commit reflows the
source.

(cherry picked from commit d401cda)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2023
The first point in the list (upgrade the master-ineligible nodes) is
redundant and sort of contradicts the second one (upgrade the data nodes
tier-by-tier). This commit drops it.

The second point had some redundant sentences in a somewhat awkward
order. This commit cleans that up.

There's no mention of nodes that are neither data nodes nor
master-eligible nodes. In fact it doesn't really matter when these nodes
are upgraded, but this commit specifies to upgrade them before the
master-eligible nodes for the sake of completeness.

Finally, there were some over-long lines so this commit reflows the
source.

(cherry picked from commit d401cda)
DaveCTurner added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2023
The first point in the list (upgrade the master-ineligible nodes) is
redundant and sort of contradicts the second one (upgrade the data nodes
tier-by-tier). This commit drops it.

The second point had some redundant sentences in a somewhat awkward
order. This commit cleans that up.

There's no mention of nodes that are neither data nodes nor
master-eligible nodes. In fact it doesn't really matter when these nodes
are upgraded, but this commit specifies to upgrade them before the
master-eligible nodes for the sake of completeness.

Finally, there were some over-long lines so this commit reflows the
source.

(cherry picked from commit d401cda)

Co-authored-by: David Turner <[email protected]>
DaveCTurner added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2023
The first point in the list (upgrade the master-ineligible nodes) is
redundant and sort of contradicts the second one (upgrade the data nodes
tier-by-tier). This commit drops it.

The second point had some redundant sentences in a somewhat awkward
order. This commit cleans that up.

There's no mention of nodes that are neither data nodes nor
master-eligible nodes. In fact it doesn't really matter when these nodes
are upgraded, but this commit specifies to upgrade them before the
master-eligible nodes for the sake of completeness.

Finally, there were some over-long lines so this commit reflows the
source.

(cherry picked from commit d401cda)

Co-authored-by: David Turner <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-8.10 Automated backport with mergify backport-8.11 Automated backport with mergify v8.10 v8.11 v8.12
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants