Add Kruskal-Wallis method

[rempsyc]

Closes #396

---

library(report)

x <- kruskal.test(airquality$Ozone ~ as.factor(airquality$Month))

report(x)
#> Warning: Missing values detected. NAs dropped.
#> Effect sizes were labelled following Field's (2013) recommendations.
#> 
#> The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test testing the difference in ranks between
#> airquality$Ozone and as.factor(airquality$Month) suggests that the effect is
#> statistically significant, and large (Kruskal-Wallis chi2 = 29.27, p < .001;
#> Epsilon squared (rank) = 0.25, 95% CI [0.15, 1.00])

^{Created on 2023-10-15 with reprex v2.0.2}

[rempsyc]

Waiting on #395 to be merged before fixing workflows here

[rempsyc]

@IndrajeetPatil I'm seeing errors that I don't understand. In DESCRIPTION file, I have (as suggested by Daniel):

Remotes: 
  easystats/insight,
  easystats/datawizard,
  easystats/parameters,
  easystats/effectsize,
  easystats/bayestestR,
  easystats/performance

So locally on Windows I ran easystats::install_latest() and updated all my CRAN packages to latest, and I get 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 notes.

On GHA, check-readme fails but is a false positive (installation error); check-random-test-order fails for test-report.brmsfit.R although I have not changed this file and that it has a single test_that() call, and there is no information on the error; and test-coverage fails with

Error: Error: Failure in `C:/Users/runneradmin/AppData/Local/Temp/RtmpSOg0tv/R_LIBS7e4792a5e1/report/report-tests/testthat.Rout.fail`
       │ └─base::eval(expr, envir)
 14.               │   └─base::eval(expr, envir)
 15.               └─brms::do_call(rstan::stan_model, args)
 16.                 └─brms:::eval2(call, envir = args, enclos = envir)
 17.                   └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
 18.                     └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
 19.                       └─rstan (local) .fun(model_code = .x1)

So still related to brms, but locally I also have the latest brms version, and again, I haven't modified those files... 🤔

---

Edit: Also, R-CMD-check-strict also fails because of the following note:

Unknown, possibly misspelled, fields in DESCRIPTION:
    ‘Remotes’

So we're not allowed to use the Remotes field on GHA testing anymore? 🤔

[IndrajeetPatil]

Also, R-CMD-check-strict also fails

This should be fixed now.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #397 (a4cfbd4) into main (f4c0697) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 72.22%.

❗ Current head a4cfbd4 differs from pull request most recent head 0b7592a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0b7592a to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #397      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.78%   73.74%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          49       50       +1     
  Lines        3494     3546      +52     
==========================================
+ Hits         2578     2615      +37     
- Misses        916      931      +15     

Files	Coverage Δ
R/report.htest.R	92.34% <100.00%> (+0.32%)	⬆️
R/report_htest_kruskal.R	65.90% <65.90%> (ø)

[rempsyc]

Thanks! All works now :) Except check-readme which I believe is a false positive:

 Backtrace:
  1. pak::lockfile_install(".github/pkg.lock")
  2. pak:::remote(function(...) { …
  3. err$throw(res$error)
  ---
  Subprocess backtrace:
   1. base::withCallingHandlers(cli_message = function(msg) { …
   2. get("lockfile_install_internal", asNamespace("pak"))(...)
   3. plan$install()
   4. pkgdepends::install_package_plan(plan, lib = private$library, num_workers = nw, …
   5. base::withCallingHandlers({ …
   6. pkgdepends:::handle_events(state, events)
   7. pkgdepends:::handle_event(state, i)
   8. pkgdepends:::stop_task(state, worker)
   9. pkgdepends:::stop_task_build(state, worker)
  10. base::throw(new_pkg_build_error("Failed to build source package {pkg}", …
  11. | base::signalCondition(cond)
  12. global (function (e) …
  Execution halted
  Error: Process completed with exit code 1.

[IndrajeetPatil]

check-readme is failing because of this issue:

✖ Failed to build OpenMx 2.21.8