Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{vis}[gfbf/2023b] mpl-ascii v0.10.0 #21707

Merged

Conversation

bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

@bedroge bedroge commented Oct 19, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

@bedroge bedroge added the update label Oct 19, 2024
@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor Author

bedroge commented Oct 19, 2024

Test report by @bedroge
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bob-Latitude-5300 - Linux Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS (Noble Numbat), x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8665U CPU @ 1.90GHz, Python 3.12.3
See https://gist.github.com/bedroge/5de2eabd0dd87042061fa0af31977298 for a full test report.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor Author

bedroge commented Oct 19, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@bedroge: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=21707 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21707 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 14540

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2423750739 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/96c6fdb8b747bf29d02c318c2e63b34e for a full test report.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor Author

bedroge commented Oct 19, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@bedroge: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=21707 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21707 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 5132

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2423756775 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/fd6dfbc5614692e762560b29e389d741 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added this to the release after 4.9.4 milestone Oct 19, 2024
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Oct 19, 2024

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3115.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 9.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/e25083749851011455c7d7f2b2fd4687 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Oct 19, 2024

Going in, thanks @bedroge!

@boegel boegel merged commit 82d62d3 into easybuilders:develop Oct 19, 2024
9 checks passed
@bedroge bedroge deleted the 20241019123633_new_pr_mpl-ascii0100 branch October 19, 2024 16:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants