-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Trailmap & Prologue first cut #93
Conversation
Just some initial copy for the trailmap prologue, needs reviewing, don't start translating this yet <3 More pages to come in the next 24hrs (libdogecoin, dogecoin standard, gigawallet) |
content/trailmap/prologue.md
Outdated
* [Project: Dogecoin Standard](/trailmap/standard/) | ||
* [Project: GigaWallet](/trailmap/gigawallet/) | ||
* Project: Dogecoin Keyring (App / SDK) | ||
* Task: Doge-In-A-Box (Core Containerisation) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❤️
* Task: Doge-In-A-Box (Core Containerisation) | |
* [Task: Doge-In-A-Box](https://github.com/dogecoin/docker/) (Core Containerisation) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh sweet, I didn't know that was a thing (looks new!) I'll take it off the list, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks awesome btw, can't wait to try it out :) hopefully an option to run without wallet and to point at the block store as params would be really handy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, it's new and still in progress, but may not be far from being ready :) You may keep it to help/promote it ❤️ By the block store, you mean the -datadir
? If yes, it's already possible. Take a look at the image documentation, only available as PR for now : dogecoin/docker#13
I guess running without a wallet shouldn't be possible. Disabling is done through the ./configure
step, and we are using release binaries which enable it by default. Need confirmation, but I think removing wallets may not be possible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, yeh I have my dev copy of core compiled without wallet support as I'm primarily interested in understanding how integrators (exchanges / platforms etc) would be using it, might not be a common use-case for others 😅
Re: promoting it, there's a current effort by a bunch of people to make a fresh new dogecoin.com site and I believe that's supposed to have a whole section of projects relating to dogecoin so I think it would make sense to go there rather than in the Foundation roadmap? If you're interested I can send you a discord invite to where folk are working on it :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of doing the containerization, your trailmap bullet point could have been to help to finish containerization :) It can be a quick win for you and the community, a good part of the job is already done !
But however you feel, it was also to show that one of your goal is already in progress somewhere else if you weren't aware !
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hopefully an option to run without wallet
dogecoind
has the option -disablewallet
;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a few grammatical suggestions. :)
Verbally approved by @RichieJohn 😓 |
No description provided.