-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
custom destination fixes #1119
custom destination fixes #1119
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for dlt-hub-docs canceled.
|
rename config spec format generic destination example
remove some unneded things from the destination tests
I think 3. is already done. |
fix tests for source decorator
@@ -437,6 +451,54 @@ def my_gcp_sink( | |||
) | |||
|
|||
|
|||
def test_destination_with_spec() -> None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lmk if this is enough wrt to testing the custom base
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
improved a little bit. spec is not a custom base. it is THE spec that will be used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! you can merge @sh-rp
@@ -437,6 +451,54 @@ def my_gcp_sink( | |||
) | |||
|
|||
|
|||
def test_destination_with_spec() -> None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
improved a little bit. spec is not a custom base. it is THE spec that will be used
Description
see commit list
@sh-rp you can take over this: