Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Facilitate the loading of AWS specifications #1219

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 2, 2023

Conversation

Baccata
Copy link
Contributor

@Baccata Baccata commented Sep 27, 2023

  • Adds logic to code-generate a list of artifacts containing AWS specifications in a Scala object
  • Add build tasks (for SBT and Mill) to lower the barrier of entry for referencing those artifacts in their build. Since the artifacts are listed as Scala values, the users get auto-completion to help set-up the code generation of AWS services.
  • Added corresponding tests for both SBT and Mill, avoiding the compilation of the generated code to save on CI time.

@Baccata Baccata changed the title Facilitate the loading of AWS specific Facilitate the loading of AWS specifications Sep 27, 2023

private case class Module(service: String, name: String)
private type GenModule = String :*: String :*: LNil
private object Module {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you still need that sjsonnew stuff? since you're parsing with jsoniter?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good point, I can remove 👍

Base automatically changed from 0.18-changelog to series/0.18 October 2, 2023 09:24
@Baccata Baccata merged commit 3d93c5c into series/0.18 Oct 2, 2023
@Baccata Baccata deleted the easier-aws-specs-loading branch October 2, 2023 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants