Route exception logs to logException #1453
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai full review please |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@shubham1g5 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 10 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughThe changes introduce enhancements to the logging functionality within the application. A new log type for exceptions is added to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/main/java/org/javarosa/core/api/ILogger.java (1)
34-34: Add Javadoc documentation for the new method.The new
logExceptionmethod should include Javadoc documentation following the pattern of other methods in this interface. This helps maintain consistency and provides important context for implementers.Consider adding:
+ /** + * Logs a Throwable exception for detailed error tracking. + * + * @param e The Throwable to be logged + */ void logException(Throwable e);src/main/java/org/javarosa/core/services/Logger.java (1)
56-63: LGTM! Consider adding unit tests.The changes look good:
- Properly uses the new TYPE_EXCEPTION constant
- Handles potential runtime exceptions appropriately
- Maintains existing behavior while adding new functionality
However, since this PR introduces new error handling logic, it would be beneficial to add unit tests.
Would you like me to help create unit tests for the following scenarios?
- Successful exception logging
- Handling null info parameter
- Recovery from logException runtime errors
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/main/java/org/commcare/util/LogTypes.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/org/javarosa/core/api/ILogger.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/org/javarosa/core/services/Logger.java(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/java/org/commcare/util/LogTypes.java (1)
119-122: LGTM! Well-documented constant addition.
The new TYPE_EXCEPTION constant is well-documented and follows the established pattern in the class.
|
@shubham1g5, certainly! I'll perform a full review of the PR as requested. ✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
Product Description
Adds a new method
logExceptiontoILoggerto be able to do any extra exceptions handling there.Required for dimagi/commcare-android#2914
Safety Assurance
Safety story
Minor change to logging
Automated test coverage
NA
QA Plan
NA
Special deploy instructions
Rollback instructions
Review
Duplicate PR
Automatically duplicate this PR as defined in contributing.md.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation