feat: add out_of_range flag to load_cdf

[pblocz]

Description

This PR changes load_cdf so:

By default

• load_cdf with starting_version out of range returns an InvalidVersion
• load_cdf with a starting_timestamp out of range returns a ChangeDataTimestampGreaterThanCommit

And you can use .with_allow_out_of_range() in rust or allow_out_of_range=True in python to make it so that both cases return an empty dataframe.

This aligns it closer with how reading the change feed works in spark and makes the behaviour consistent.

This in contrast to the current behavior:

• load_cdf with starting_version out of range returns an InvalidVersion
• load_cdf with a starting_timestamp out of range returns an empty dataframe

Related Issue(s)

• closes load_cdf return an empty dataframe when a version is out of range #3035

[github-actions]

ACTION NEEDED

delta-rs follows the Conventional Commits specification for release automation.

The PR title and description are used as the merge commit message. Please update your PR title and description to match the specification.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.60000% with 23 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72.72%. Comparing base (ba671c9) to head (b96b93b).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crates/core/src/operations/load_cdf.rs	84.29%	3 Missing and 16 partials ⚠️
python/src/lib.rs	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3040      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.68%   72.72%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         129      129              
  Lines       41462    41578     +116     
  Branches    41462    41578     +116     
==========================================
+ Hits        30137    30237     +100     
  Misses       9376     9376              
- Partials     1949     1965      +16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ion-elgreco]

Looks good! Just couple comments

[hntd187]

This looks good to me now, just rerunning CI right now local concurrency test is notoriously flakey.

[pblocz]

Awesome, seems that all the tests passed now

[hntd187]

@pblocz if you could sign off on your commits we can get this merged soon

[pblocz]

@hntd187 Done. I don't know why, but thought the sign off was something else 😅