Added static file folder

[menamerai]

Is there a way to default to using the delphi/static folder instead of the delphi folder from the from importlibs.resources import files @jaidhyani ? In here I just join the path with static every time.

[jaidhyani]

Sort of - files takes a module (or string-specifying-a-module) as an argument. So to make it point somewhere other than our package, we would need to give it a different argument. One thing we could do would be to add an __init__.py to the static dir, and then we could do files(delphi.static). Either approach is fine, I think - your call.

But either way, you're right that we shouldn't require people to type that out each time. Let's add a delphi/constants.py, which for now can just contain STATIC_ASSETS_DIR definition.

[menamerai]

@jaidhyani I added __init__.py to the directory, and added the constants file. How does it look now?

[jaidhyani]

This looks good to me. Minor follow-up tasks (edit: added as issue #42). These aren't blockers, code can be merged

1. We shouldn't necessarily force the output into the STATIC_ASSETS_DIR. Especially if the user specified a full path or a partial path with directory references, e.g.:

/home/me/Desktop/tokens.csv
subdir/tokens.csv

In the first case, the user has specified a full path, and we should use it. In the second, we can assume they're referring to a relative path from the current working directory, and we should output there.

We can get that behavior by calling os.path.split on the path arg, which returns a (head,tail) tuple. If head is empty, the user just passed a filename and we can probably throw it in the default output dir. If head isn't empty, we can call os.path.expandvars on the path arg to get the path we should output to.

2. We should also print the full path before writing, just to be explicit with the user about what file is being created and they know exactly where to look for it when it's done.

3. We should print out something when the export has completed successfully.

[joshuawe]

This branch is behind main branch, so a rebase is necessary

[menamerai]

@joshuawe I rebased, not sure if I did that correctly. Does it look ok?

I rebased