chore: use xp.take_along_axis if Array API version >=2024.12

[njzjz]

see: https://github.com/data-apis/array-api-strict/blob/d086c619a58f35c38240592ef994aa19ca7beebc/array_api_strict/_indexing_functions.py#L30-L39

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Enhanced the xp_take_along_axis function to utilize newer array API features when available, improving performance and functionality.
• Bug Fixes
  • Maintained compatibility with older versions of the array API by providing a fallback implementation.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.

Comments skipped due to low confidence (1)

deepmd/dpmodel/array_api.py:53

• Ensure that the new behavior introduced by xp.take_along_axis is covered by tests.

return xp.take_along_axis(arr, indices, axis=axis)

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce a new import statement for the Version class from the packaging.version module in the deepmd/dpmodel/array_api.py file. The xp_take_along_axis function is updated to check the version of the array API being used, allowing it to utilize the xp.take_along_axis function directly if the version meets a specified threshold. If not, it falls back to an alternative implementation. This ensures compatibility with both newer and older versions of the array API.

Changes

File	Change Summary
deepmd/dpmodel/array_api.py	Added import for Version class; updated xp_take_along_axis function to check array API version and conditionally call xp.take_along_axis or fallback implementation.

Possibly related PRs

• style: extend no-explicit-dtype check to xp and jnp #4247: This PR modifies the xp_take_along_axis function in the same file (deepmd/dpmodel/array_api.py), indicating a direct connection through changes made to the same function.
• chore: optimize compute_smooth_weight #4390: This PR focuses on the compute_smooth_weight function in a different file but involves changes related to versioning and API compatibility, which may relate to the version checks introduced in the main PR.

Suggested labels

Python

Suggested reviewers

• wanghan-iapcm

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

deepmd/dpmodel/array_api.py (1)

51-53: Consider centralizing array API version checks

Consider moving the version check logic to a dedicated function or constant at the module level. This would:

1. Avoid repeated version parsing
2. Make it easier to update version requirements
3. Provide a single point of control for array API compatibility

Example approach:

# At module level
SUPPORTS_TAKE_ALONG_AXIS = Version(array_api_compat.array_namespace(...).__array_api_version__) >= Version("2024.12")

# In function
if SUPPORTS_TAKE_ALONG_AXIS:
    return xp.take_along_axis(arr, indices, axis=axis)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7bd2e5a and 2bf4869.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• deepmd/dpmodel/array_api.py (2 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

deepmd/dpmodel/array_api.py (1)

5-7: LGTM: Clean import of Version class

The addition of Version from packaging.version is appropriate for semantic version comparison.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.64%. Comparing base (7bd2e5a) to head (2bf4869).
Report is 6 commits behind head on devel.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
deepmd/dpmodel/array_api.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            devel    #4406   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.64%   84.64%           
=======================================
  Files         614      614           
  Lines       57007    57010    +3     
  Branches     3486     3487    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        48254    48258    +4     
- Misses       7627     7628    +1     
+ Partials     1126     1124    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests
• JS Bundle Analysis - Avoid shipping oversized bundles