Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(Q1): merge #3836 in 2024Q1 #3852

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

iProzd
Copy link
Collaborator

@iProzd iProzd commented Jun 4, 2024

No description provided.

@iProzd iProzd requested a review from njzjz June 4, 2024 10:06
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Python label Jun 4, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.61%. Comparing base (22026a8) to head (1299d68).
Report is 13 commits behind head on 2024Q1.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
deepmd/pt/utils/auto_batch_size.py 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           2024Q1    #3852      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.64%   81.61%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         496      496              
  Lines       45790    45793       +3     
  Branches     2895     2895              
==========================================
- Hits        37386    37376      -10     
- Misses       7525     7538      +13     
  Partials      879      879              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@njzjz
Copy link
Member

njzjz commented Jun 4, 2024

I feel that you may use git cherry-pick instead of hard copying...

@njzjz njzjz merged commit d39bb94 into deepmodeling:2024Q1 Jun 4, 2024
48 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants