Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: ut for the smoothness when pair exclusion presents #3650

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

wanghan-iapcm
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm requested review from njzjz and iProzd April 7, 2024 03:42
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Python label Apr 7, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.80%. Comparing base (39d027e) to head (d1ddcad).
Report is 1 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            devel    #3650   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.80%   81.80%           
=======================================
  Files         503      503           
  Lines       46445    46445           
  Branches     2952     2952           
=======================================
  Hits        37993    37993           
  Misses       7559     7559           
  Partials      893      893           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@iProzd iProzd added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 8, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Apr 8, 2024
@njzjz njzjz added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit 6f0bda5 Apr 8, 2024
48 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants