Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

style: fix Ruff 0.8.0 UP031 errors #88

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

njzjz-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@njzjz-bot njzjz-bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Generated by the task: njzjz-bot/njzjz-bot#12.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the copyright variable format in the Sphinx documentation configuration for improved readability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the docs/conf.py file, which is used for configuring the Sphinx documentation builder. The main change involves updating the copyright variable from a traditional string formatting method to an f-string format. This change improves the readability of the code while keeping the rest of the configuration intact. No new features or alterations to the existing logic and functionality of the configuration file are introduced.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/conf.py Updated copyright variable from string formatting to f-string for readability.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Sphinx

    User->>Sphinx: Request documentation build
    Sphinx->>Sphinx: Read configuration from conf.py
    Sphinx->>Sphinx: Process copyright information
    Sphinx->>User: Return built documentation
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 357d910 and a0b5a40.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/conf.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • docs/conf.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@njzjz njzjz merged commit 68019a9 into deepmodeling:master Nov 27, 2024
5 checks passed
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.43%. Comparing base (357d910) to head (a0b5a40).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #88   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.43%   78.43%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines         765      765           
=======================================
  Hits          600      600           
  Misses        165      165           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants