feat(query): speed up fetching redis data from dictionaries via mget.

[Dragonliu2018]

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://docs.databend.com/dev/policies/cla/

Summary

Previous Impl: For the Column type, loop through the Column and get the values from Redis one by one via OpenDAL.

Current Impl: OpenDAL only supports fetching one value at a time, so we use redis client to fetch the data in batches (via mget).

We also try to add a cache for performance optimization. The LRU cache is used first, and the performance is shown in the table below. However, the performance is not stable. Performance is good if the required data is cached, but poor if it is not or if the cache is full. In addition, we need to handle stale data in the cache to avoid wasting memory. So the TTL cache is tried, but the performance is worse than the LRU cache. So we temporarily give up on using cache for optimization. Related code: #16882

strategy \ key count \ elapsed time(seconds)	1w	10w	100w	1kw
Previous Impl (one by one)	7.338	73.229	594.109	386.483
Current Impl (in batches)	0.051	0.145	0.66	5.194
in batches + LRU cache (data not cached)	0.074	0.197	1.049	6.841
in batches + LRU cache (data cached)	0.034	0.079	0.505	3.228

Reproduce:

# Create Redis DICTIONARY
CREATE OR REPLACE DICTIONARY d1 ( key VARCHAR NULL, value VARCHAR NOT NULL) PRIMARY KEY key
SOURCE(redis(host='100.73.238.81' port='6379'));

# Create test table and insert 1kw keys
CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE red_test_10000000 AS
SELECT
    number % 100000000 AS id,
    concat('key', id::string) as key
FROM numbers(10000000);

# test SQL
select key, dict_get(d1, 'value', key) from red_test_10000000;

part of #16550

Tests

• Unit Test
• Logic Test
• Benchmark Test
• No Test - Explain why

Type of change

• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking Change (fix or feature that could cause existing functionality not to work as expected)
• Documentation Update
• Refactoring
• Performance Improvement
• Other (please describe):

---

This change is 

[Xuanwo]

This PR reminds me the possibility of adding mget support in opendal.

[b41sh]

This PR reminds me the possibility of adding mget support in opendal.

@Xuanwo Can OpenDAL consider adding mget? With OpenDAL, we can simplify the code.

[Xuanwo]

@Xuanwo Can OpenDAL consider adding mget? With OpenDAL, we can simplify the code.

Not in the near future. We can revisit this part later ❤️