rename get_rows to take

[MarcoGorelli]

In pandas, there's .iloc, but the consortium doesn't want that

Polars has .gather

pytorch also uses gather for this kind of operation:

>>> t = torch.tensor([1, 2, 3, 4])
>>> torch.gather(t, 0, torch.tensor([3, 2]))
tensor([4, 3])

tensorflow has gather, which does the same kind of thing https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/gather

I've not seen get_rows anywhere, it's definitely not a common name. Personally I'd rather go with common existing names than create new ones

I promise I'll stop bikeshedding after February (when we aim to make the first non-beta release), trying to get it all out before then

[kkraus14]

I'm +1 to gather as well

[jorisvandenbossche]

FWIW, not being familiar with a gather method before, I don't find that name necessarily obvious (I would rather guess it does something like "collect").
If you want a name that is already used by other libraries, take is another obvious candidate, which is being used by pandas, numpy and also the array api (I am not sure if I would find take necessarily a more obvious name if I would not be familiar with it already (hard to say because I am)).

[MarcoGorelli]

thanks for your inputs - I'm OK with either, I think they're both improvements over get_rows

[MarcoGorelli]

looks like R has gather, but it does something completely different http://statseducation.com/Introduction-to-R/modules/tidy%20data/gather/

maybe take is better then

[MarcoGorelli]

@kkraus14 you OK with take too?

[MarcoGorelli]

thanks all, let's get this in then