Add DataFrame.iter_columns() and simplify #326
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MarcoGorelli
force-pushed
the
columns-iter
branch
from
45212b3 to
a03cf9c
Compare
MarcoGorelli
force-pushed
the
columns-iter
branch
from
a03cf9c to
dcb95a3
Compare
MarcoGorelli
changed the title
Out of curiosity: Is it a general design principle to avoid function names that exist in Pandas/Polars but have different semantics there? |
|
I don't think it's been written out, but tbh I'd prefer that |
|
approved in today's call |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This simplifies a few examples and makes things more ergonomic
Can't just use
DataFrame.columnsas pandas / Polars already use that for column names unfortunately