Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle nodata values and masks in read_geotif #13

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

HaleySchuhl
Copy link
Contributor

@HaleySchuhl HaleySchuhl commented Aug 30, 2024

Describe your changes
Add detection and check for mask layer within geotifs by adding it as a supported "wavelength" with a label of "0nm".

Type of update
Is this a:

  • feature enhancement
  • Work in progress

Associated issues
Reference associated issue numbers. Does this pull request close any issues?

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

For the reviewer
See this page for instructions on how to review the pull request.

  • PR functionality reviewed in a Jupyter Notebook
  • All tests pass
  • Test coverage remains 100%
  • Documentation tested
  • New documentation pages added to plantcv/mkdocs.yml
  • Changes to function input/output signatures added to updating.md
  • Code reviewed
  • PR approved

Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Aug 30, 2024

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits eab6982..f4ab272. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Python LogoPython✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage✅ SuccessView Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregatePython
Branch Coverage100%100%
Composite Coverage100%100%
Line Coverage100%100%
New Branch Coverage100%100%
New Composite Coverage100%100%
New Line Coverage100%100%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@dhiraj-ms dhiraj-ms merged commit 155fc39 into main Sep 17, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request ready to review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants