Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove: enable command for stopping workflows #6514

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

oliver-sanders
Copy link
Member

  • A documented use case for cylc remove is "orphaning" stuck submissions, e.g. jobs that we can no longer poll or kill due to platform or network issues.
  • It is conceivable that we might need to do this whilst a workflow is shutting down

Check List

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md and added my name as a Code Contributor.
  • Contains logically grouped changes (else tidy your branch by rebase).
  • Does not contain off-topic changes (use other PRs for other changes).
  • Applied any dependency changes to both setup.cfg (and conda-environment.yml if present).
  • Tests are included (or explain why tests are not needed).
  • Changelog entry included if this is a change that can affect users
  • Cylc-Doc pull request opened if required at cylc/cylc-doc/pull/XXXX.
  • If this is a bug fix, PR should be raised against the relevant ?.?.x branch.

* A documented use case for `cylc remove` is "orphaning" stuck
  submissions, e.g. jobs that we can no longer poll or kill due to
  platform or network issues.
* It is conceivable that we might need to do this whilst a workflow is
  shutting down.
@oliver-sanders oliver-sanders added this to the 8.4.0 milestone Dec 4, 2024
@oliver-sanders oliver-sanders self-assigned this Dec 4, 2024
@MetRonnie MetRonnie merged commit e3f77a5 into cylc:master Dec 4, 2024
27 checks passed
@oliver-sanders oliver-sanders deleted the remove-in-stopping-workflow branch December 4, 2024 17:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants