Cultural Formation deprecated in favour of Cultural Form. Closes Ticket

#45

cwrc-template.html

@@ -99,11 +99,11 @@ <h2 id="contents">Table of Contents</h2>
     <li><a href="#linkages">b. Linkages to other ontologies</a></li>
     <li><a href="#provenance">c. Provenance and contexts</a></li>
     <li><a href="#labelsandvalues">d. Labels and values</a></li>
-    <li><a href="#culturalformationsgeneric">e. Cultural Formations</a></li>
+    <li><a href="#culturalformationsgeneric">e. Cultural Form</a></li>
     </ul>
     <li><a href="#structures">6. CWRC ontological structures</a></li>
     <ul style="list-style-type: none">
-    <li><a href="#culturalformationsontology">a. Cultural Formations</a></li>    
+    <li><a href="#culturalformationsontology">a. Cultural Form</a></li>    
     <li><a href="#contextontology">b. Contexts</a></li>    
     <li><a href="#granularproperties">c. Granular Properties</a></li> 
     <li><a href="#taxonomiesontology">d. Built-in Taxonomies</a></li>
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ <h4 id="linkages">b. Linkages to other ontologies</h4>
     the <a href="#_getty_2017">Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus</a> (<a href="http://www.getty.edu/research/index.html">Getty Research
     Institute</a>).  Other
     terms are referenced but at one remove.  This is particularly common in
-    relation to the vocabulary associated with Cultural Formation (see below),
+    relation to the vocabulary associated with Cultural Form (see below),
     which is understood primarily as representational, and within which identity
     terms are typed as labels and related to other internal narrower instances of labels
     that indicate the intersection of that term with one or more type of
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ <h4 id="linkages">b. Linkages to other ontologies</h4>
     terms and their definitions are not commensurate
     with those used in the CWRC vocabulary. By means of this structure, our
     vocabulary positions all terms associated with processes of Cultural
-    Formation as in effect labels, retaining the ambiguity of terms implicated in the complex social construction of identities.</p>
+    Form as in effect labels, retaining the ambiguity of terms implicated in the complex social construction of identities.</p>
 
 
     <p>Vocabulary reuse presented some challenges to the CWRC in that the
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ <h4 id="linkages">b. Linkages to other ontologies</h4>
      <li>The <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/">Open Annotation</a> data model is used to link the original Orlando
      text to specific <a href="#Context">Contexts</a>.</li>
      <li>The <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/">SKOS</a> vocabulary is use to represent taxonomical relationships
-     within certain <a href="#CulturalFormation">Cultural Formation<a/>s and
+     within certain <a href="#CulturalForm">Cultural Form<a/>s and
      to fully document ontology terms.</li>
      <li>Some <a href="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/">Dublin Core</a> vocabulary terms are used for well known documentation
      tags such as &lt;dc:title&gt;.
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ <h4 id="culturalformationsgeneric">e. Cultural diversity</h4>
     understanding of identity categories, as instantiated in The Orlando
     Project’s XML Biography schema. 
 
-    The Cultural Formation portion of the ontology recognizes categorization as
+    The Cultural Form portion of the ontology recognizes categorization as
     endemic to social experience, while incorporating variation in terminology
     and the contextualization of identity categories.  It understands social
     classification as culturally produced, intersecting, and discursively
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ <h3 id="structures">6. CWRC ontological structures</h3>
 
 
     <p>Two basic structures are used within the ontology to achieve this: <a
-    href="#Context">Context</a>s and <a href="#CulturalFormation">Cultural Formations<a/>.
+    href="#Context">Context</a>s and <a href="#CulturalForm">Cultural Form<a/>.
     A cultural formation represent elements of lived social subjectivities
     and/or classification of people through categories such as race, gender, language, sexuality, or religion.
     Contexts are used to link a fragment of Orlando prose to the individual
@@ -336,17 +336,17 @@ <h3 id="structures">6. CWRC ontological structures</h3>
     two categories: reported and self-reported, allowing for the
     qualification of individual statements.</p>
 
-    <h4 id="culturalformationsontology">a. Cultural Formations</h4>    
+    <h4 id="culturalformationsontology">a. Cultural Form</h4>    
 
- <p>The <a href="#CulturalFormation">Cultural Formation<a/> classes
+ <p>The <a href="#CulturalForm">Cultural Form<a/> classes
  recognize categorization as endemic to social experience, while
  incorporating variation in terminology and contextualization of identity
  categories by employing instances at different discursive levels.</p>  
 
- <p>Cultural Formation sub-classes and instances describe the subject positions 
+ <p>Cultural Form sub-classes and instances describe the subject positions 
  of individuals through both <a href="#Context">Context</a>s and granular
  properties. This arrangements has its roots in the Orlando arrangement of
- Cultural Formations encodings that pointed users towards a framework for 
+ Cultural Form encodings that pointed users towards a framework for 
  raising and debating complex matters for cultural investigation rather than invoking reified
 categories.</p>
 
@@ -356,8 +356,8 @@ <h4 id="culturalformationsontology">a. Cultural Formations</h4>
 black, English, etc.: white and black can
 represent race or ethnicity, while English can also be invoked as an ethnicity,
 nationality, or a national heritage. Orlando marks these strings using
-its Cultural Formations tagset as specific to, for example, the context of race or
-ethnicity, mandating a similar association, within the linked data representation, with a specific instance of Cultural Formation. Thus, there exist Cultural Formation instances that point to the discursive construction of <a
+its Cultural Forms tagset as specific to, for example, the context of race or
+ethnicity, mandating a similar association, within the linked data representation, with a specific instance of Cultural Form. Thus, there exist Cultural Form instances that point to the discursive construction of <a
 href="#whiteRace">white</a> as a race and <a href="#whiteEthnicity">white</a>
 as an ethnicity. Lastly, there also exists a <a href="#whiteLabel">white</a>
 label that can be instantiated as either race or ethnicity, but not both within the same assertion (although multiple assertions are possible).</p>
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ <h4 id="culturalformationsontology">a. Cultural Formations</h4>
 appropriately, since multiple representations of the same label are
 present within the CWRC ontology. As a last resort, or for data mining
 purposes, the term is also available as an concept whose actual Cultural
-Formation is undecided amongst the CWRC-defined options. This allows for
+Form is undecided amongst the CWRC-defined options. This allows for
 linkages to an external ontology, such as can be required by text mining, without
 endorsing the corresponding definition or interpretation of the term.</p>