Problem: no compatible pebble db supported #1606
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing support for PebbleDB. Key changes include modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1606 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.12% 36.12%
=======================================
Files 97 97
Lines 7725 7725
=======================================
Hits 2791 2791
Misses 4585 4585
Partials 349 349 |
yihuang
requested review from
yihuang and
calvinaco
and removed request for
a team
Co-authored-by: mmsqe <[email protected]>
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
9-9: Consider adding more details to the unreleased entry.The unreleased entry currently only contains one item. It would be helpful to provide more context or details about this fix for PebbleDB support. Consider adding information about the nature of the fix and its impact.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
🔇 Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- default.nix (1 hunks)
- go.mod (4 hunks)
- gomod2nix.toml (4 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnet (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (17)
default.nix (1)
16-16: LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.The change from "grocksdb_no_link" to "pebbledb" in the tags list aligns with the PR objective of addressing Pebble database compatibility. This modification suggests a shift from RocksDB to PebbleDB, which is a significant change in the underlying database technology.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following verification script:
Additionally, please ensure that any relevant documentation (e.g., README, configuration guides) is updated to reflect this change from RocksDB to PebbleDB.
Consider adding a comment in the Nix file explaining the reason for this change, such as:
# Switched from RocksDB to PebbleDB for improved compatibility and performance tags = [ "ledger" "netgo" network "rocksdb" "pebbledb" "objstore" ] ++ lib.optionals nativeByteOrder [ "nativebyteorder" ];This will help future maintainers understand the rationale behind this change.
integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnet (2)
65-67: LGTM! Clarify 'app-db-backend' usage.The addition of 'pebbledb' as the 'app-db-backend' for the second validator further aligns with the PR objective. This setting appears to be specific to the application layer.
To ensure consistency and clarify the usage of 'app-db-backend', please run the following verification:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the app-db-backend configuration and its relationship with db_backend # Test: Check for all occurrences of 'app-db-backend' in the configuration rg --type json 'app-db-backend' integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnet # Test: Look for any documentation or comments explaining the relationship between 'db_backend' and 'app-db-backend' rg --type json -i 'db.?backend' -C 10 integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnet # Test: Check if there are any other files in the project that might explain the usage of these settings fd -t f | xargs rg -i 'app.?db.?backend'Could you please clarify:
- The relationship between 'db_backend' and 'app-db-backend'?
- Why the first validator doesn't have an explicit 'app-db-backend' setting?
- Are there any implications of using different backends for 'db_backend' and 'app-db-backend'?
62-64: LGTM! Verify mixed database backend setup.The addition of 'pebbledb' as the database backend for the second validator aligns with the PR objective. This change introduces a mixed database backend setup, with the first validator using 'rocksdb' and the second using 'pebbledb'.
To ensure this mixed setup is intentional and properly handled, please run the following verification:
✅ Verification successful
Verified Mixed Database Backend Configuration
The configuration correctly includes both
rocksdbandpebbledbfor different validators. Test scripts appropriately enforcerocksdbwhere necessary, ensuring the mixed setup is intentional and properly managed.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the database backend configuration for validators # Test: Check if both 'rocksdb' and 'pebbledb' are used in the configuration rg --type json 'db_backend.*rocksdb' integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnet rg --type json 'db_backend.*pebbledb' integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnet # Test: Look for any conditional logic or comments related to mixed database backends rg --type json -i 'db.?backend' -C 5 integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnetLength of output: 2577
Makefile (2)
18-18: LGTM: Addition of Pebble DB supportThe addition of 'pebbledb' to the build tags is a good step towards addressing the compatibility issue with Pebble DB, as mentioned in the PR objectives.
To ensure this change is sufficient, please verify if any other files need modification to fully support Pebble DB. You can use the following script to check for any references to Pebble DB in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for Pebble DB references in the codebase # Search for Pebble DB related imports or usage echo "Searching for Pebble DB references in Go files:" rg --type go "pebble" # Search for Pebble DB related configuration echo "Searching for Pebble DB configuration:" rg "pebble" --type yaml --type toml --type json # Search for Pebble DB in documentation echo "Searching for Pebble DB mentions in documentation:" rg "pebble" --type md --type txtThis will help ensure that all necessary changes for Pebble DB support have been made across the project.
18-18: Verify impact on build processThe addition of 'pebbledb' to
build_tagswill affect various parts of the build process. Please ensure that:
- This change doesn't conflict with other database options (e.g., cleveldb, badgerdb, rocksdb, boltdb).
- All relevant build targets and configurations work as expected with this new tag.
- The change doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior in the build process.
You can use the following script to check how the 'pebbledb' tag is used throughout the Makefile:
This will help ensure that the 'pebbledb' tag is correctly propagated and doesn't cause any issues in the build process.
go.mod (4)
Line range hint
1-285: Summary of go.mod changesThe changes in this file primarily involve updating dependencies and managing custom forks. Here's a summary of the key points:
- Several dependencies have been updated, including a major version update for
github.com/dgraph-io/badger.- New indirect dependencies have been added, likely due to the update of
github.com/cockroachdb/pebble.- Custom forks are being used for some dependencies, particularly
github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum.These changes are generally acceptable but require careful consideration:
- Ensure thorough testing of the updated dependencies, especially
github.com/dgraph-io/badgerdue to the major version change.- Verify that the new indirect dependencies don't introduce security vulnerabilities or licensing issues.
- Regularly sync and review differences between forked dependencies and their upstream repositories.
Maintaining these practices will help ensure the stability and security of your project while benefiting from the latest improvements in your dependencies.
276-277: Using forked version of go-ethereumThe
github.com/ethereum/go-ethereumdependency is being replaced with a forked version:github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum => github.com/crypto-org-chain/go-ethereum v1.10.20-0.20240926023215-d2275b4afb9aWhile this allows for custom modifications, it may lead to divergence from the upstream repository.
To ensure you're not missing important updates or security patches:
- Regularly sync your fork with the upstream repository.
- Review the differences between your fork and the upstream version:
#!/bin/bash # Clone both repositories git clone https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum.git upstream-ethereum git clone https://github.com/crypto-org-chain/go-ethereum.git forked-ethereum # Navigate to the forked repository cd forked-ethereum # Add upstream remote git remote add upstream https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum.git # Fetch upstream changes git fetch upstream # Show differences git diff upstream/master...master # Return to the original directory cd ..
- Consider creating a plan to periodically merge upstream changes into your fork.
108-109: Major version update for github.com/dgraph-io/badgerThe
github.com/dgraph-io/badgerdependency has been updated from v2.2007.4 to v4.2.0, which is a major version update. This may introduce breaking changes in the API.Please ensure that all uses of this library have been updated to be compatible with the new version. Run the following script to check for potential incompatibilities:
After reviewing the results, make sure to thoroughly test the affected parts of the codebase to ensure compatibility with the new version.
84-88: New indirect dependencies addedNew indirect dependencies have been introduced:
github.com/cockroachdb/fifogithub.com/cockroachdb/tokenbucketThese are likely required by the updated
github.com/cockroachdb/pebbledependency.Please verify that these new dependencies:
- Don't introduce any security vulnerabilities
- Have compatible licenses with your project
Run the following command to check for known vulnerabilities:
Also, review the licenses of these new dependencies to ensure compatibility with your project.
gomod2nix.toml (7)
143-145: New dependency added: github.com/cockroachdb/fifoThe addition of this new dependency appears to be related to the Pebble database compatibility update. Can you please provide more context on how this FIFO package is used in relation to Pebble?
150-151: Pebble database updated to stable version v1.1.2This update is crucial for addressing the PR's main objective of Pebble database compatibility. Moving from a development version to a stable release (v1.1.2) is a significant improvement. Great job on this update!
155-157: New dependency added: github.com/cockroachdb/tokenbucketThis new dependency appears to be related to the Pebble database update. Could you explain how the tokenbucket package is utilized in the context of the Pebble implementation? Is it used for rate limiting or another specific purpose?
165-166: CometBFT DB updated to stable version v0.12.0This update to a stable version of cometbft-db is a good improvement. While not directly related to the Pebble compatibility issue, it enhances the overall database functionality of the project. Have you tested the compatibility of this version with the other database changes?
Line range hint
1-724: Summary of dependency changesOverall, the changes in this file align well with the PR objective of addressing Pebble database compatibility. Here's a summary of the key points:
- Pebble DB has been updated to a stable version (v1.1.2), which is crucial for the project's objectives.
- New dependencies (github.com/cockroachdb/fifo and github.com/cockroachdb/tokenbucket) have been added, likely to support the Pebble implementation.
- Other database-related dependencies (CometBFT DB and Badger DB) have received significant updates.
- The Ethereum dependency has been updated and replaced with a custom fork.
These changes appear to be well-considered, but please address the questions raised in the individual comments, particularly regarding:
- The purpose and usage of the new FIFO and tokenbucket packages.
- The impact and migration process for the major Badger DB update.
- The reasons for using a custom Ethereum fork and its maintenance strategy.
Once these points are clarified, the dependency updates look good to proceed.
262-264: Updated Ethereum dependency and custom forkThe Ethereum dependency has been updated to a newer commit while maintaining the base version v1.10.20. Additionally, it's being replaced with a custom fork at github.com/crypto-org-chain/go-ethereum.
- Can you explain the reasons for using a custom fork instead of the official Ethereum repository?
- What specific modifications or features does this fork provide that are necessary for the project?
- How do you plan to keep this fork in sync with upstream changes?
Please provide some context on the decision to use a custom fork and the update process.
237-239: Major version update: Badger DB v2.2007.4 to v4.2.0This is a significant version jump for the Badger database, moving from version 2 to version 4. Such a major update likely introduces breaking changes and may require code modifications.
- Have you reviewed the changelog for any breaking changes?
- Were any code modifications necessary to accommodate this update?
- Have you thoroughly tested the application with this new version to ensure compatibility?
Please provide details on the migration process and any challenges encountered.
CHANGELOG.md (1)
Line range hint
11-24: Good job on documenting improvements and bug fixes in v1.0.7.The changelog entry for v1.0.7 is well-structured and informative. It clearly outlines the improvements and bug fixes, providing links to the relevant pull requests. This helps users and developers understand the changes in this version.
🧰 Tools
Markdownlint
11-11: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻
PR Checklist:
make)make test)go fmt)golangci-lint run)go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Dependency Updates
github.com/cockroachdb/pebbleto versionv1.1.2andgithub.com/dgraph-io/badgerto versionv4.2.0.Build Configuration
pebbledb.