Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: failed to load package descriptor #1364

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 26, 2024

Conversation

mmsqe
Copy link
Collaborator

@mmsqe mmsqe commented Mar 26, 2024

due to golang/protobuf version mismatch

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

  • Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
  • Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
  • Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
  • Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
  • Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
  • Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
  • Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
  • Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
  • If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
  • If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
  • If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
  • If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
  • If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

due to golang/protobuf version mismatch
@mmsqe mmsqe requested a review from a team as a code owner March 26, 2024 06:21
@mmsqe mmsqe requested review from JayT106 and thomas-nguy and removed request for a team March 26, 2024 06:21
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

Files ignored due to path filters (6)
  • memiavl/go.mod is excluded by: !**/*.mod
  • memiavl/go.sum is excluded by: !**/*.sum
  • store/go.mod is excluded by: !**/*.mod
  • store/go.sum is excluded by: !**/*.sum
  • versiondb/go.mod is excluded by: !**/*.mod
  • versiondb/go.sum is excluded by: !**/*.sum

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 15.90%. Comparing base (a300760) to head (ad1e18d).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1364       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   36.71%   15.90%   -20.81%     
===========================================
  Files         108       80       -28     
  Lines        9642     6230     -3412     
===========================================
- Hits         3540      991     -2549     
+ Misses       5753     5160      -593     
+ Partials      349       79      -270     

see 52 files with indirect coverage changes

@yihuang yihuang added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into crypto-org-chain:main with commit 96642b2 Mar 26, 2024
34 of 35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants