Problem: batch call precompile is not tested #1360
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates span across various configuration and test files, primarily focusing on adjusting loop ranges, modifying contract addresses, and introducing new functionalities like batch transaction handling in Solidity contracts. Additionally, the updates include changes in constants, new utility functions, and revisions to dependencies, enhancing the system's flexibility and addressing specific needs like gas computations in tests. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
mmsqe
force-pushed
the
batch_call
branch
2 times, most recently
from
448f9c4 to
a6a6fd4
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1360 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 35.86% 17.78% -18.09%
===========================================
Files 136 87 -49
Lines 9870 5337 -4533
===========================================
- Hits 3540 949 -2591
+ Misses 5934 4278 -1656
+ Partials 396 110 -286 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
integration_tests/ibc_utils.py (2)
17-17: Add a docstring to thederive_new_accountfunction.Providing a brief description of what the function does, its parameters, and its return value can greatly enhance the readability and maintainability of the code.
Line range hint
430-486: Add inline comments to clarify complex logic.The function
ibc_incentivized_transfercontains several complex operations related to handling balances and fees. Adding inline comments explaining each step can greatly improve the readability and maintainability of the code.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (8)
- integration_tests/configs/ibc.jsonnet (2 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/ibc_rly_evm.jsonnet (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/contracts/contracts/TestRelayer.sol (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/ibc_utils.py (6 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_ibc_rly.py (2 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_ibc_rly_gas.py (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/utils.py (2 hunks)
- nix/sources.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- nix/sources.json
Additional comments not posted (8)
integration_tests/configs/ibc_rly_evm.jsonnet (1)
6-6: Update ofprecompiled_contract_addressto '0x6F1805D56bF05b7be10857F376A5b1c160C8f72C' is noted.integration_tests/contracts/contracts/TestRelayer.sol (1)
4-12: Addition ofTestRelayercontract withbatchCallfunction is noted. Ensure that reentrancy guards are considered if applicable.integration_tests/test_ibc_rly_gas.py (1)
26-26: Adjustment ofdiffvalue to0.15in gas-related tests is noted. Verify that this new threshold aligns with recent gas usage metrics.integration_tests/configs/ibc.jsonnet (1)
15-15: Reduction of iteration range in for-loops is noted. Ensure that all necessary test cases are still adequately covered.Also applies to: 90-90
integration_tests/test_ibc_rly.py (1)
10-10: Addition ofRELAYER_CALLERconstant is noted. Consider adding comments to clarify its usage in tests.integration_tests/utils.py (2)
63-63: Addition ofTestRelayertoTEST_CONTRACTSis noted. Ensure that this is correctly referenced in relevant tests.
401-406: Addition ofderive_new_accountfunction is noted. Verify the correctness of the account derivation logic and consider adding comments for clarity.Verification successful
The output from the shell script provides the implementation details of the
derive_new_accountfunction as found in theintegration_tests/utils.pyfile. The function constructs an account path using a derivation indexn, retrieves a mnemonic from an environment variable, and then uses these to derive a new account using theAccount.from_mnemonicmethod. This method is a standard approach for deriving blockchain accounts from mnemonics, suggesting that the function is implemented correctly given typical usage patterns in blockchain development.However, the script output does not provide information on the correctness of the account derivation in terms of actual functionality (e.g., does it correctly handle different values of
n, does it fail gracefully if the environment variable is not set, etc.). These aspects typically require running the function with various inputs or adding unit tests.Since the basic implementation aligns with standard practices and no further specific issues were highlighted in the review comment, the function appears to be implemented correctly based on the information available.
Conclusion:
Thederive_new_accountfunction uses standard methods for account derivation from mnemonics and is implemented as expected in the Python code. No issues are found based on the review of the implementation details provided.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `derive_new_account` function. # Test: Check the function's account derivation logic. Expect: Correctly derived accounts. echo "Review the `derive_new_account` function to ensure it correctly derives new accounts as intended."Length of output: 272
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `derive_new_account` function by checking its implementation in Python. # Use ripgrep to find the implementation details of `derive_new_account` in Python files. rg "def derive_new_account" --context 10Length of output: 1310
integration_tests/ibc_utils.py (1)
29-29: Ensure theRELAYER_CALLERaddress is validated.Verification successful
The shell script provided in the review comment was executed to verify whether the
RELAYER_CALLERaddress is a valid Ethereum address. The script uses a regular expression to check if the address matches the typical format of an Ethereum address, which is a 42-character string starting with0xfollowed by 40 hexadecimal characters.The output of the script confirms that the address
0x6F1805D56bF05b7be10857F376A5b1c160C8f72Cmatches this pattern, indicating that it is a valid Ethereum address format.Given this information, the verification of the
RELAYER_CALLERaddress format as a valid Ethereum address is successful.
The
RELAYER_CALLERaddress format has been verified as valid.
- The address
0x6F1805D56bF05b7be10857F376A5b1c160C8f72Ccorrectly matches the Ethereum address format.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the RELAYER_CALLER address is a valid Ethereum address. # Test: Check if the address is a valid Ethereum address. Expect: Address is valid. echo "0x6F1805D56bF05b7be10857F376A5b1c160C8f72C" | grep -E '^0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}$'Length of output: 124
* cleanup * Problem: batch call precompile is not tested fix test * update deps
* cleanup * Problem: batch call precompile is not tested fix test * update deps
👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻
PR Checklist:
make)make test)go fmt)golangci-lint run)go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)
Summary by CodeRabbit
TestRelayerwith batch transaction functionality.