Problem: ica incentivized is not tested

[mmsqe]

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

• Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
• Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
• Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
• Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
• Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
• Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
• Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
• Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
• If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
• If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
• If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
• If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
• If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a new function for enhanced transaction handling in interchain accounts.
  • Added test cases for incentivized transactions in interchain accounts.

• Refactor

  • Streamlined transaction sending logic in interchain account tests by utilizing the new function.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent changes introduce a new function for handling transactions with additional parameters and logic for interchain accounts. This function is utilized in the test_ica to streamline the transaction process. Additionally, new test cases for incentivized interchain account transactions have been added, covering setup, registration, fund transfers, and verification of fees and balances, enhancing the robustness of interchain account testing.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.../ibc_utils.py	Added ica_ctrl_send_tx function for sending transactions with interchain accounts.
.../test_ica.py	Refactored to use ica_ctrl_send_tx for transaction sending, removing previous inline logic.
.../test_ica_incentivized.py	Added test cases for incentivized interchain account transactions, including setup and verification.

🐰✨
In the realm of code, where the logic threads weave,
A rabbit hopped in, with changes up its sleeve.
Transactions flow, with ease and grace,
Across chains and blocks, in the digital space.
Let's celebrate the code, so deftly spun,
For now, the tests and transactions, as one, do run.
🌟🐇

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bc73ca5 and 42b6572.

Files selected for processing (3)

• integration_tests/ibc_utils.py (1 hunks)
• integration_tests/test_ica.py (2 hunks)
• integration_tests/test_ica_incentivized.py (1 hunks)

Additional comments: 3

integration_tests/test_ica_incentivized.py (2)

• 17-22: The use of yield from with prepare_network in the ibc fixture is correct and ensures proper setup and teardown of the network for the module-scoped tests. This is a good practice for resource management in tests.
• 25-99: This test function test_incentivized is well-structured and covers a comprehensive scenario for testing incentivized ICA transactions. It includes setup, sending transactions, and verifying the outcomes such as balances and fees. However, there are a few areas for improvement and verification:

1. The hardcoded connection ID, port ID, and denominations might limit the test's flexibility. Consider parameterizing these values or retrieving them dynamically if the test environment might vary.
2. The sleep call (time.sleep(3)) on line 33 is generally discouraged in tests as it introduces potential flakiness. If this wait is necessary for synchronization purposes, consider implementing a more reliable waiting mechanism based on specific conditions.
3. The test assumes specific initial balances and fees without explicitly setting or verifying these preconditions. For robustness, ensure that the test setup includes setting up the initial state as expected or add checks to validate the assumptions.
4. The use of magic numbers (e.g., amount = 1000, fee = f"10{fee_denom}") could be replaced with named constants for better readability and maintainability.

Overall, the test function demonstrates a good approach to testing complex scenarios but could benefit from enhancements for flexibility, reliability, and clarity.

integration_tests/test_ica.py (1)

• 53-63: The refactoring to use ica_ctrl_send_tx in the test_ica function simplifies the process of sending transactions from an interchain account and is a positive change for maintainability and readability. However, ensure that the memo parameter's structure and usage are correctly documented and understood, as it seems to be specific to this test scenario. Additionally, verify that all necessary parameters are passed correctly to ica_ctrl_send_tx and that the function's behavior aligns with the test's expectations.