Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove unneeded flush privileges call for mysql #141 #147

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mariusziemke
Copy link

Description of your changes

Fixes #141

According to mysql documentation executing FLUSH PRIVILEGES is only required If you modify the grant tables directly using statements such as INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE (which is not recommended), the changes have no effect on privilege checking until you either tell the server to reload the tables or restart it. (dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/privilege-changes.html). Other references:

stackoverflow.com/questions/36463966/mysql-when-is-flush-privileges-in-mysql-really-needed
docs.pingcap.com/tidb/dev/sql-statement-flush-privileges

I have:

  • Read and followed Crossplane's contribution process.
  • Run make reviewable to ensure this PR is ready for review.

How has this code been tested

The change has been running in our various dev and production environments for a few weeks now. We tried to break our database clusters by adding and removing lots of users concurrently and everything works as expected. Before removing the Flush Privileges call we had a lot of trouble in our replicated db setup which tried to protect itself from inconsistency by just shutting down after adding more then one user at the same time.

@mariusziemke
Copy link
Author

Hi, can anyone look into this PR? Thanks!

@Jibux
Copy link

Jibux commented Jan 30, 2024

We are interested on this fix because we have issue with our percona xtradb cluster witch can be stuck because of FLUSH PRIVILEGES. Thanks in advance for the reviewer(s).

@fgaillot-qosenergy
Copy link
Contributor

Also interested for having this merged for the next release, thanks in advance.

@Duologic
Copy link
Member

Would you mind rebasing?

Signed-off-by: Marius Ziemke <[email protected]>
@mariusziemke
Copy link
Author

@Duologic done.

@Duologic
Copy link
Member

Ah sorry, missed that this would conflict with #171, this might even simplify it more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants