Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: patch-up support for merge_group #42

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

louis-bompart
Copy link
Collaborator

@louis-bompart louis-bompart requested review from a team as code owners May 3, 2024 03:42
@louis-bompart louis-bompart changed the title fix: patch-up support for merge_group fix: patch-up support for merge_group May 3, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2024

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails

Scanned Manifest Files

1 similar comment
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2024

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails

Scanned Manifest Files

@@ -58,3 +58,5 @@ jobs:
comment-summary-in-pr: ${{ inputs.comment-summary-in-pr }}
fail-on-severity: high
config-file: ./coveo-dependency-allowed-licenses/${{ steps.select-config.outputs.result }}
base-ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.sha || 'main' }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about repos like platform-client that have a master branch instead of main? Maybe we could define inputs instead which would be more flexible? I started a branch yesterday without knowing you were also working on this. 😅

4d40b8a

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops! I jumped the gun. I prefer your approach, let's use it 👍
However, after actions/dependency-review-action#766, I think we should remove the default value

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants