-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 231
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add StringWriter
interface to ResponseWriter
#921
Closed
romainmenke
wants to merge
5
commits into
corazawaf:main
from
romainmenke:add-stringwriter-interface-to-response-writer--philosophical-asian-giant-hornet-90e534f95d
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mind pointing at an example of another similar code that implements
io.StringWriter
? This doesn't seem so bad, but I'm wondering when a caller wouldn't just callWrite([]byte(s))
themselves without inspecting the interfaces.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This used to a thing but now I only find old references.
Like these :
I suspect that
WriteString
onResponseWriter
is no longer common and thatWrite([]bytes(s))
is the idiomatic way.We still have a bunch of tests to make sure that all middleware we add implements the needed interfaces. But it has been a while (±6 years) since I revisited those tests.
e.g.
CloseNotifier
is also unimplemented here but that is documented as deprecated inhttp
.So, yeah, this is ok to close for me :)
It can always be revisited if there is an actual need for this and not because of some legacy requirement.
Thank you for the super speedy review 🙇
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot for the investigation @romainmenke! Yeah let's go ahead and close for now then, if we find a strong use case for it we can reintroduce it.