fix#1065

[swapnilgawade16]

Closes #1065

Few details on the fix:

KafkaConsumerManager's Consumer Expiration Thread acquires a lock on (KafkaConsumerManager.this instance) and calls expired method of KafkaConsumerState.java. The Consumer Expiration Thread sometimes takes time to get the lock on synchronized expired because there can be a consumer consuming records that has a lock on the KafkaConsumerState instance which may take longer to release depending on the time taken in the IO to fetch the records from kafka broker. The situation can get worse with more number of active consumers fetching records.

The two locks for expired and updateExpiration are not required.

Thread dump snippets

"qtp1551629761-29" prio=5 Id=29 BLOCKED on io.confluent.kafkarest.v2.KafkaConsumerManager@3a09eed4 owned by "Consumer Expiration Thread" Id=47
 at app//io.confluent.kafkarest.v2.KafkaConsumerManager.getConsumerInstance(KafkaConsumerManager.java:669)
 -  blocked on io.confluent.kafkarest.v2.KafkaConsumerManager@3a09eed4 at app//io.confluent.kafkarest.v2.KafkaConsumerManager.getConsumerInstance(KafkaConsumerManager.java:679)

"qtp1551629761-35" prio=5 Id=35 BLOCKED on io.confluent.kafkarest.v2.KafkaConsumerManager@3a09eed4 owned by "Consumer Expiration Thread" Id=47
 at app//io.confluent.kafkarest.v2.KafkaConsumerManager.createConsumer(KafkaConsumerManager.java:180)
 -  blocked on io.confluent.kafkarest.v2.KafkaConsumerManager@3a09eed4 

"Consumer Expiration Thread" daemon prio=5 Id=47 BLOCKED on io.confluent.kafkarest.v2.JsonKafkaConsumerState@4d2bbeda owned by "pool-4-thread-13" Id=153
 at app//io.confluent.kafkarest.v2.KafkaConsumerState.expired(KafkaConsumerState.java:345)
 -  blocked on io.confluent.kafkarest.v2.JsonKafkaConsumerState@4d2bbeda at app//io.confluent.kafkarest.v2.KafkaConsumerManager$ExpirationThread.run(KafkaConsumerManager.java:761)
 -  locked io.confluent.kafkarest.v2.KafkaConsumerManager@3a09eed4

"pool-4-thread-13" prio=5 Id=153 RUNNABLE (in native)
 at [email protected]/sun.nio.ch.EPoll.wait(Native Method)
 at [email protected]/sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:120)
 at [email protected]/sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:124)
 -  locked sun.nio.ch.Util$2@1458190c
 -  locked sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl@3ebca1e6
 at [email protected]/sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:136)
 at app//org.apache.kafka.common.network.Selector.select(Selector.java:869)
 at app//org.apache.kafka.common.network.Selector.poll(Selector.java:465)
 at app//org.apache.kafka.clients.NetworkClient.poll(NetworkClient.java:561)
 at app//org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.internals.ConsumerNetworkClient.poll(ConsumerNetworkClient.java:265)
 

[ehumber]

Hi @swapnilgawade16

I've not looked at the code changes yet, but to get me started on the details of this a bit quicker, could you please provide a description of why the two locks are no longer needed?

They were originally added as part of 1695f4e but unfortunately that doesn't describe the details of why they are needed either.

Thank you!

[swapnilgawade16]

Hi @swapnilgawade16

I've not looked at the code changes yet, but to get me started on the details of this a bit quicker, could you please provide a description of why the two locks are no longer needed?

They were originally added as part of 1695f4e but unfortunately that doesn't describe the details of why they are needed either.

Thank you!

There was a ReentrantLock used before as you can see in KafkaConsumerState.java. This I guess it was replaced with making all the methods synchronized. However if you check specifically for expired and updateExpiration methods in latest code they are synchronized as well as use a expiration object lock. These two methods basically do not update with any of the core consumer state, they just are there to update and get the expiration state. Hence IMO there is no need for these two methods to be synchronized. Keeping them synchronized does cause a lot of problem in high traffic as I have mentioned in the description of the issue. Basically there is no need to block expiry check while any of the consumer operations are active such as seekToBeginning, assign, createConsumer, etc.

[swapnilgawade16]

@ehumber Any idea by when this change will be merged ?

[cla-assistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}