Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding state-machine-cat #22544

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

tuanpham96
Copy link

@tuanpham96 tuanpham96 commented Apr 12, 2023

Checklist

  • Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
  • License file is packaged (see here for an example).
  • Source is from official source.
  • Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
  • If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
  • Package does not ship static libraries. If static libraries are needed, follow CFEP-18.
  • Build number is 0.
  • A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
  • GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
  • When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/state-machine-cat) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/state-machine-cat:

  • There are too few lines. There should be one empty line at the end of the file.

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/state-machine-cat) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/state-machine-cat:

  • There are 1 too many lines. There should be one empty line at the end of the file.

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/state-machine-cat) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@tuanpham96
Copy link
Author

@conda-forge/help-nodejs This is ready for review!

@tuanpham96
Copy link
Author

@conda-forge-admin, please ping conda-forge/help-nodejs

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I was asked to ping @conda-forge/help-nodejs and so here I am doing that.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 28, 2023

Hi friend!

We really, really, really appreciate that you have taken the time to make a PR on conda-forge/staged-recipes! conda-forge only exists because people like you donate their time to build and maintain conda recipes for use by the community.

In an effort to maintain this repository and increase the signal-to-noise for open PRs, the maintainers of staged-recipes close excessively old PRs after six months. This PR will remain open for another month, and then will be closed.

If you'd like to keep it open, please comment/push and we will be happy to oblige! Note that very old PRs will likely need to be rebased on main so that they can be rebuilt with the most recent CI scripts. If you have any trouble, or we missed reviewing this PR in the first place (sorry!), feel free to ping the team using a special command in a comment on the PR to get the attention of the staged-recipes team.

Cheers and thank you for contributing to this community effort!

@stale stale bot added the stale will be closed in 30 days label Sep 28, 2023
@tuanpham96 tuanpham96 closed this Oct 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
nodejs review-requested stale will be closed in 30 days
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants