Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency lru-cache to v11 #108

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 10, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
lru-cache ^7.14.0 -> ^11.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

isaacs/node-lru-cache (lru-cache)

v11.0.2

Compare Source

v11.0.1

Compare Source

v11.0.0

Compare Source

v10.4.3

Compare Source

v10.4.2

Compare Source

v10.4.1

Compare Source

v10.4.0

Compare Source

v10.3.1

Compare Source

v10.3.0

Compare Source

  • add forceFetch() method
  • set disposeReason to 'expire' when it's the result of a TTL
    expiration, or 'fetch' when it's the result of an aborted
    or undefined-returning fetch()
  • add memo() method

v10.2.2

Compare Source

v10.2.1

Compare Source

v10.2.0

Compare Source

  • types: implement the Map<K, V> interface

v10.1.0

Compare Source

  • add cache.info(key) to get value as well as ttl and size
    information.

v10.0.3

Compare Source

v10.0.2

Compare Source

v10.0.1

Compare Source

v10.0.0

Compare Source

  • cache.fetch() return type is now Promise<V | undefined>
    instead of Promise<V | void>. This is an irrelevant change
    practically speaking, but can require changes for TypeScript
    users.

v9.1.2

Compare Source

v9.1.1

Compare Source

v9.1.0

Compare Source

  • cache.set(key, undefined) is now an alias for
    cache.delete(key)

v9.0.3

Compare Source

v9.0.2

Compare Source

v9.0.1

Compare Source

v9.0.0

Compare Source

  • Use named export only, no default export.
  • Bring back minimal polyfill. If this polyfill ends up being
    used, then a warning is printed, as it is not safe for use
    outside of LRUCache.

v8.0.5

Compare Source

v8.0.4

Compare Source

v8.0.3

Compare Source

v8.0.2

Compare Source

v8.0.1

Compare Source

v8.0.0

Compare Source

  • The fetchContext option was renamed to context, and may no
    longer be set on the cache instance itself.
  • Rewritten in TypeScript, so pretty much all the types moved
    around a lot.
  • The AbortController/AbortSignal polyfill is removed. For this
    reason, Node version 16.14.0 or higher is now required.
  • Internal properties were moved to actual private class
    properties.
  • Keys and values must not be null or undefined.
  • Minified export available at 'lru-cache/min', for both CJS
    and MJS builds.

v7.18.3

Compare Source

v7.18.2

Compare Source

v7.18.1

Compare Source

v7.18.0

Compare Source

  • Add support for internal state investigation through the use of
    a status option to has(), set(), get(), and fetch().

v7.17.2

Compare Source

v7.17.1

Compare Source

v7.17.0

Compare Source

  • Add signal option for fetch to pass a user-supplied
    AbortSignal
  • Add ignoreFetchAbort and allowStaleOnFetchAbort options

v7.16.2

Compare Source

  • Fail fetch() promises when they are aborted

v7.16.1

Compare Source

v7.16.0

Compare Source

  • Add allowStaleOnFetchRejection option

v7.15.0

Compare Source

  • Provide both ESM and CommonJS exports

v7.14.1

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 7am every weekday" in timezone Europe/Brussels, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants