-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
wip generic predicates #435
Draft
metlos
wants to merge
4
commits into
codeready-toolchain:master
Choose a base branch
from
metlos:assertions
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ | ||||||||||
package test | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
import ( | ||||||||||
"strings" | ||||||||||
"testing" | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
toolchainv1alpha1 "github.com/codeready-toolchain/api/api/v1alpha1" | ||||||||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" | ||||||||||
corev1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1" | ||||||||||
"sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/client" | ||||||||||
) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
func TestExplain(t *testing.T) { | ||||||||||
t.Run("with diff", func(t *testing.T) { | ||||||||||
// given | ||||||||||
actual := &corev1.Secret{} | ||||||||||
actual.SetName("actual") | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
pred := Has(Name("expected")) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
// when | ||||||||||
expl := Explain(pred, actual) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
// then | ||||||||||
assert.True(t, strings.HasPrefix(expl, "predicate 'test.named' didn't match the object because of the following differences (- indicates the expected values, + the actual values):")) | ||||||||||
assert.Contains(t, expl, "-") | ||||||||||
assert.Contains(t, expl, "\"expected\"") | ||||||||||
assert.Contains(t, expl, "+") | ||||||||||
assert.Contains(t, expl, "\"actual\"") | ||||||||||
}) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
t.Run("without diff", func(t *testing.T) { | ||||||||||
// given | ||||||||||
actual := &corev1.Secret{} | ||||||||||
actual.SetName("actual") | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
pred := Is[client.Object](&predicateWithoutFixing{}) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
// when | ||||||||||
expl := Explain(pred, actual) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
// then | ||||||||||
assert.Equal(t, "predicate 'test.predicateWithoutFixing' didn't match the object", expl) | ||||||||||
}) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
t.Run("with a slice", func(t *testing.T) { | ||||||||||
actual := []int{1, 2, 3} | ||||||||||
pred := MockPredicate[[]int]{} | ||||||||||
pred.MatchesFunc = func(v []int) bool { | ||||||||||
return false | ||||||||||
} | ||||||||||
pred.FixToMatchFunc = func(v []int) []int { | ||||||||||
return []int{1, 2} | ||||||||||
} | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
expl := Explain(Is[[]int](pred), actual) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
assert.True(t, strings.HasPrefix(expl, "predicate 'test.MockPredicate[[]int]' didn't match the object because of the following")) | ||||||||||
}) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
t.Run("with conditions", func(t *testing.T) { | ||||||||||
actual := []toolchainv1alpha1.Condition{ | ||||||||||
{ | ||||||||||
Type: toolchainv1alpha1.ConditionType("test"), | ||||||||||
Status: corev1.ConditionFalse, | ||||||||||
Reason: "because", | ||||||||||
}, | ||||||||||
} | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
pred := ConditionThat(toolchainv1alpha1.ConditionType("test"), HasStatus(corev1.ConditionTrue)) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
expl := Explain(Has(pred), actual) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
assert.True(t, strings.HasPrefix(expl, "predicate 'test.conditionsPredicate' didn't match the object because of the following")) | ||||||||||
}) | ||||||||||
} | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
func TestAssertThat(t *testing.T) { | ||||||||||
t.Run("positive case", func(t *testing.T) { | ||||||||||
// given | ||||||||||
actual := &corev1.ConfigMap{} | ||||||||||
actual.SetName("actual") | ||||||||||
actual.SetLabels(map[string]string{"k": "v"}) | ||||||||||
Comment on lines
+81
to
+83
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe it's worth doing some aux function for creating the ConfigMap just to avoid duplication (there are two occurrences in these test, and another one in TestNamePredicate. maybe will need it more for the upcoming tests). WDYT?
Suggested change
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
// when | ||||||||||
message := assertThat(actual, Has(Name("actual")), Has(Labels(map[string]string{"k": "v"}))) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
// then | ||||||||||
assert.Empty(t, message) | ||||||||||
}) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
t.Run("negative case", func(t *testing.T) { | ||||||||||
// given | ||||||||||
actual := &corev1.ConfigMap{} | ||||||||||
actual.SetName("actual") | ||||||||||
actual.SetLabels(map[string]string{"k": "v"}) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
// when | ||||||||||
message := assertThat(actual, Has(Name("expected")), Has(Labels(map[string]string{"k": "another value"}))) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
// then | ||||||||||
assert.Contains(t, message, "predicate 'test.named' didn't match the object because of the following differences") | ||||||||||
assert.Contains(t, message, "predicate 'test.hasLabels' didn't match the object because of the following differences") | ||||||||||
}) | ||||||||||
} | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
type predicateWithoutFixing struct{} | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
var _ Predicate[client.Object] = (*predicateWithoutFixing)(nil) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
func (*predicateWithoutFixing) Matches(obj client.Object) bool { | ||||||||||
return false | ||||||||||
} | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
type MockPredicate[T any] struct { | ||||||||||
MatchesFunc func(v T) bool | ||||||||||
FixToMatchFunc func(v T) T | ||||||||||
} | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
func (p MockPredicate[T]) Matches(v T) bool { | ||||||||||
return p.MatchesFunc(v) | ||||||||||
} | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
func (p MockPredicate[T]) FixToMatch(v T) T { | ||||||||||
return p.FixToMatchFunc(v) | ||||||||||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To avoid duplication of the test cases and to make the tests easier to read, we can use a table-driven approach, if you agree. Something like this: