-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove kubernetesimagepuller webhook #526
Remove kubernetesimagepuller webhook #526
Conversation
Signed-off-by: David Kwon <[email protected]>
Hi @dkwon17. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a codeready-toolchain member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Signed-off-by: David Kwon <[email protected]>
Quality Gate passedKudos, no new issues were introduced! 0 New issues |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #526 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.54% 83.22% +0.68%
==========================================
Files 29 28 -1
Lines 3220 3178 -42
==========================================
- Hits 2658 2645 -13
+ Misses 426 399 -27
+ Partials 136 134 -2 |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alexeykazakov, dkwon17 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/ok-to-test |
37fba83
into
codeready-toolchain:master
Removes the kubernetesimagepuller webhook introduced in #493
Since the Kubernetes Image Puller Operator v1.1.0 provides its own webhook to limit image puller resources, this webhook on the member-operator side is not needed anymore.