Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚡️ Speed up function select_proxy by 22% #23

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

codeflash-ai[bot]
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Dec 22, 2024

📄 22% (0.22x) speedup for select_proxy in src/requests/utils.py

⏱️ Runtime : 1.02 millisecond 829 microseconds (best of 21 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

Sure! Here is a more optimized version of the program.

Changes Made.

  1. Import urlparse from urllib.parse instead of src.requests.compat for a more standard approach.
  2. Removed the reassignment of proxies to itself with a default empty dictionary since we handle the if not proxies check earlier.
  3. Instead of constructing a list and iterating over potentially multiple keys in a loop, use the or operator to check for each proxy key in a single statement, reducing overhead and making it faster.
  4. Simplified by storing urlparts.hostname into hostname.

These changes help in reducing the complexity of the function and should result in a better overall performance.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 70 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 59 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests Details
- test_utils.py
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
from urllib.parse import urlparse  # used to parse URLs

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.requests.utils import select_proxy

# unit tests

# Basic Functionality
def test_single_scheme_proxy():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'http': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'https': 'https://proxy.com'})

def test_single_scheme_and_hostname_proxy():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'http://example.com': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'https://example.com': 'https://proxy.com'})

# Default Proxy
def test_default_proxy():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'all': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'all': 'https://proxy.com'})

# Hostname-specific Proxy
def test_hostname_specific_proxy():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'all://example.com': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'all://example.com': 'https://proxy.com'})

# Combination of Proxies
def test_combination_of_proxies():
    proxies = {
        'http://example.com': 'http://proxy1.com',
        'http': 'http://proxy2.com',
        'all': 'http://proxy3.com'
    }
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', proxies)
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://another.com', proxies)
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', proxies)

# No Matching Proxy
def test_no_matching_proxy():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'https': 'https://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'http': 'http://proxy.com'})

# Malformed URLs
def test_malformed_urls():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http:///path', {'http': 'http://proxy.com', 'all': 'http://proxy2.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https:///path', {'https': 'https://proxy.com', 'all': 'https://proxy2.com'})

# Empty and None Proxies
def test_empty_and_none_proxies():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', None)
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', None)

# Case Sensitivity
def test_case_sensitivity():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'HTTP://EXAMPLE.COM': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'HTTPS://EXAMPLE.COM': 'https://proxy.com'})

# Large Scale Test Cases
def test_large_scale_proxies():
    proxies = {f'http://example{i}.com': f'http://proxy{i}.com' for i in range(1000)}
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example500.com', proxies)
    proxies = {f'https://example{i}.com': f'https://proxy{i}.com' for i in range(1000)}
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example500.com', proxies)

# Mixed Schemes and Hostnames
def test_mixed_schemes_and_hostnames():
    proxies = {
        'http://example.com': 'http://proxy1.com',
        'https://example.com': 'https://proxy2.com',
        'all://example.com': 'http://proxy3.com',
        'all': 'http://proxy4.com'
    }
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', proxies)
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', proxies)
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://another.com', proxies)
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://another.com', proxies)

# Invalid Proxies Dictionary
def test_invalid_proxies_dictionary():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'invalid_key': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'http': 'invalid_value'})

# Run the tests
if __name__ == "__main__":
    pytest.main()
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.

from urllib.parse import urlparse  # we use urllib's urlparse for testing

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.requests.utils import select_proxy

# unit tests

def test_basic_single_scheme_proxy():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'http': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'https': 'https://proxy.com'})

def test_basic_scheme_and_hostname_proxy():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'http://example.com': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'https://example.com': 'https://proxy.com'})

def test_general_all_schemes_proxy():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'all': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'all': 'https://proxy.com'})

def test_general_all_schemes_and_specific_hostname_proxy():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'all://example.com': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'all://example.com': 'https://proxy.com'})

def test_no_proxy():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', None)
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', None)

def test_invalid_or_malformed_urls():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http:///', {'http': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https:///', {'https': 'https://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('invalid_url', {'http': 'http://proxy.com'})

def test_no_matching_proxy():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'https': 'https://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'http': 'http://proxy.com'})

def test_multiple_matching_proxies():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', {'http': 'http://proxy1.com', 'all': 'http://proxy2.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com', {'https': 'https://proxy1.com', 'all': 'https://proxy2.com'})

def test_large_proxies_dictionary():
    large_proxies = {f"http://example{i}.com": f"http://proxy{i}.com" for i in range(1000)}
    large_proxies["http://example.com"] = "http://proxy.com"
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com', large_proxies)

def test_url_with_port():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com:8080', {'http://example.com:8080': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com:443', {'https://example.com:443': 'https://proxy.com'})

def test_url_with_path():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com/path', {'http://example.com': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com/path', {'https://example.com': 'https://proxy.com'})

def test_mixed_case_schemes():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('HTTP://example.com', {'http': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('HTTPS://example.com', {'https': 'https://proxy.com'})

def test_complex_urls():
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com?query=1', {'http': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com?query=1', {'https': 'https://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('http://example.com#fragment', {'http': 'http://proxy.com'})
    codeflash_output = select_proxy('https://example.com#fragment', {'https': 'https://proxy.com'})
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.

📢 Feedback on this optimization? Discord

Sure! Here is a more optimized version of the program.



### Changes Made.
1. Import `urlparse` from `urllib.parse` instead of `src.requests.compat` for a more standard approach.
2. Removed the reassignment of `proxies` to itself with a default empty dictionary since we handle the `if not proxies` check earlier.
3. Instead of constructing a list and iterating over potentially multiple keys in a loop, use the `or` operator to check for each proxy key in a single statement, reducing overhead and making it faster.
4. Simplified by storing `urlparts.hostname` into `hostname`.

These changes help in reducing the complexity of the function and should result in a better overall performance.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Dec 22, 2024
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from alvin-r December 22, 2024 17:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants