Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚡️ Speed up function to_name by 117% in cli/codeflash/verification/test_results.py #50

Closed

Conversation

codeflash-ai-dev[bot]
Copy link

📄 to_name() in cli/codeflash/verification/test_results.py

📈 Performance improved by 117% (1.17x faster)

⏱️ Runtime went down from 9.58 to 4.42

Explanation and details

This version doesn't create a dict each time function is called. This reduces memory consumption and increases speed. Each enum name is directly mapped to its corresponding string without looking up in dictionary, this is more efficient and quicker in execution.

Correctness verification

The new optimized code was tested for correctness. The results are listed below.

🔘 (none found) − ⚙️ Existing Unit Tests

✅ 6 Passed − 🌀 Generated Regression Tests

(click to show generated tests)
# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from enum import Enum
from codeflash.verification.test_results import TestType

# unit tests

# Test that the method returns the correct string for each defined enumeration member.
def test_to_name_existing_unit_test():
    assert TestType.EXISTING_UNIT_TEST.to_name() == "⚙️ Existing Unit Tests"

def test_to_name_inspired_regression():
    assert TestType.INSPIRED_REGRESSION.to_name() == "🎨 Inspired Regression Tests"

def test_to_name_generated_regression():
    assert TestType.GENERATED_REGRESSION.to_name() == "🌀 Generated Regression Tests"

# Test the behavior when the method is called on a member that is not in the `names` dictionary.
def test_to_name_undefined_member():
    with pytest.raises(KeyError):
        TestType(99).to_name()  # Assuming 99 is not a valid member

# Test the behavior when attempting to call `to_name` without an instance of the enum.
def test_to_name_without_instance():
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):
        TestType.to_name(TestType.EXISTING_UNIT_TEST)

# Test the behavior if the `TestType` enum class is modified at runtime.
def test_to_name_after_runtime_modification():
    TestType.NEW_UNIT_TEST = 4
    with pytest.raises(KeyError):
        TestType.NEW_UNIT_TEST.to_name()
    del TestType.NEW_UNIT_TEST  # Cleanup after test

# Test that the method only accepts valid `TestType` enumeration members and not other data types.
@pytest.mark.parametrize("invalid_value", [0, "EXISTING_UNIT_TEST", None, 3.14])
def test_to_name_with_invalid_types(invalid_value):
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):
        TestType.to_name(invalid_value)

# Test the behavior when the enum has duplicate values.
def test_to_name_duplicate_values():
    TestType.ALIAS_UNIT_TEST = TestType.EXISTING_UNIT_TEST
    assert TestType.ALIAS_UNIT_TEST.to_name() == "⚙️ Existing Unit Tests"
    del TestType.ALIAS_UNIT_TEST  # Cleanup after test

# Ensure that the tests produce deterministic results.
def test_to_name_deterministic_results():
    result1 = TestType.EXISTING_UNIT_TEST.to_name()
    result2 = TestType.EXISTING_UNIT_TEST.to_name()
    assert result1 == result2 == "⚙️ Existing Unit Tests"

This version doesn't create a dict each time function is called. This reduces memory consumption and increases speed. Each enum name is directly mapped to its corresponding string without looking up in dictionary, this is more efficient and quicker in execution.
@codeflash-ai-dev codeflash-ai-dev bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by CodeFlash AI label Sep 10, 2024
@codeflash-ai-dev codeflash-ai-dev bot requested a review from KRRT7 September 10, 2024 22:16
@KRRT7
Copy link

KRRT7 commented Sep 10, 2024

test.

@KRRT7
Copy link

KRRT7 commented Sep 10, 2024

edited.

@KRRT7
Copy link

KRRT7 commented Sep 11, 2024

temp

@KRRT7 KRRT7 closed this Sep 11, 2024
@KRRT7 KRRT7 deleted the codeflash/optimize-to_name-2024-09-10T22.16.45 branch September 17, 2024 11:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by CodeFlash AI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant