⚡️ Speed up function foreign_key_exists
by 51% in src/backend/base/langflow/utils/migration.py
#94
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄
foreign_key_exists
insrc/backend/base/langflow/utils/migration.py
✨ Performance Summary:
51%
(0.51x
faster)171 milliseconds
down to113 milliseconds
(best of5
runs)📝 Explanation and details
To optimize the given code for checking if a foreign key exists in a table using SQLAlchemy, we can make the following changes.
sqlalchemy.inspect
which is more common thansqlalchemy.engine.reflection.Inspector
.Here's the optimized version.
Changes made.
Inspector.from_engine
toinspect(conn)
which is considered more direct and readable.any
generator for checking the presence of the foreign key instead of creating a list, which could consume more memory and time. This results in short-circuit evaluation and immediate return upon finding a match.✅ Correctness verification
The new optimized code was tested for correctness. The results are listed below:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
Click to view details
📣 **Feedback**
If you have any feedback or need assistance, feel free to join our Discord community: