⚡️ Speed up is_lc_serializable()
by 12% in libs/langchain/langchain/evaluation/comparison/eval_chain.py
#35
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄
is_lc_serializable()
inlibs/langchain/langchain/evaluation/comparison/eval_chain.py
📈 Performance went up by
12%
(0.12x
faster)⏱️ Runtime went down from
4.70μs
to4.20μs
Explanation and details
(click to show)
Your provided Python code doesn't appear to involve any heavy computations, loops, or memory-consuming operations that could be optimized for performance improvement.
is_lc_serializable
function is just serving as a getter to return a boolean constant. But to get a bit of performance improvement, you can change from a classmethod to a staticmethod. Here's the slightly optimized version of your code.Conversion from classmethod to staticmethod is not necessarily an optimization here, it's considered better practice as the method doesn't use any class or instance specific data.
Python internally uses instance methods for classmethod calls which would be slower compared to a staticmethod call which doesn't involve instance method overheads. Although the actual performance improvement would be negligible and wouldn't be noticeable unless called millions of times, it's still technically a minor optimization given your code.
Correctness verification
The new optimized code was tested for correctness. The results are listed below.
✅ 0 Passed − ⚙️ Existing Unit Tests
✅ 0 Passed − 🎨 Inspired Regression Tests
✅ 3 Passed − 🌀 Generated Regression Tests
(click to show generated tests)