⚡️ Speed up _get_prompt()
by 48% in libs/langchain/langchain/smith/evaluation/runner_utils.py
#25
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄
_get_prompt()
inlibs/langchain/langchain/smith/evaluation/runner_utils.py
📈 Performance went up by
48%
(0.48x
faster)⏱️ Runtime went down from
29.80μs
to20.20μs
Explanation and details
(click to show)
The original function spends a lot of time checking the types of input data, throwing an exception if the types do not match the expected ones, and then processing the data. This can be optimized by reducing the number of conditional statements and type checks, and also by simplifying the control flow.
Here's a rewritten version of the function that accomplishes the same thing more efficiently by reordering some checks and taking advantage of the early return pattern.
This function operates on the basis of short-circuiting, where it will return as soon as it has found a valid prompt. This reduces the number of checks it performs in many cases and streamlines the control flow of the function. It also simplifies the checks for 'prompt' and 'prompts', checking validity and returning the result in the same statement.
Correctness verification
The new optimized code was tested for correctness. The results are listed below.
✅ 0 Passed − ⚙️ Existing Unit Tests
✅ 0 Passed − 🎨 Inspired Regression Tests
✅ 7 Passed − 🌀 Generated Regression Tests
(click to show generated tests)