Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚡️ Speed up method Group.get_groups by 9% in facebook_business/adobjects/group.py #9

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

codeflash-ai[bot]
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Nov 30, 2024

📄 Group.get_groups() in facebook_business/adobjects/group.py

📈 Performance improved by 9% (0.09x faster)

⏱️ Runtime went down from 18.1 milliseconds to 16.7 milliseconds (best of 5 runs)

Explanation and details

Here is the optimized version of the code.

Optimizations done:

  1. Removed redundant import statements.
  2. Used f-strings for concatenated strings for better readability and performance.
  3. Simplified some function expressions by combining conditions and using Pythonic idioms.
  4. Made dictionary operations more efficient by directly iterating over items where applicable.
  5. Reduced the usage of if condition else constructs where possible to streamline the code.
  6. Combined .add_params() and .add_fields() calls for clarity.

Note that the performance gain from these optimizations in a network-intensive context like Facebook API calls will mostly come from cleaner logic and reduced overhead, but the actual API call performance is bound by external response times.

Correctness verification

The new optimized code was tested for correctness. The results are listed below.

🔘 (none found) − ⚙️ Existing Unit Tests

✅ 2 Passed − 🌀 Generated Regression Tests

(click to show generated tests)
import copy
import importlib
import os
import warnings
from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
import six
from facebook_business import apiconfig
# function to test
from facebook_business.adobjects.abstractcrudobject import AbstractCrudObject
from facebook_business.adobjects.group import Group
from facebook_business.adobjects.objectparser import ObjectParser
from facebook_business.api import Cursor, FacebookAdsApi, FacebookRequest
from facebook_business.exceptions import (FacebookBadObjectError,
                                          FacebookBadParameterError,
                                          FacebookBadParameterTypeException)
from facebook_business.typechecker import TypeChecker
from facebook_business.utils import api_utils

# unit tests

# Basic Functionality Tests









def test_get_groups_api_error():
    group = Group(fbid='123', api=MagicMock())
    group._api.call = MagicMock(side_effect=FacebookBadObjectError("API Error"))
    with pytest.raises(FacebookBadObjectError):
        group.get_groups()

def test_get_groups_network_error():
    group = Group(fbid='123', api=MagicMock())
    group._api.call = MagicMock(side_effect=Exception("Network Error"))
    with pytest.raises(Exception):
        group.get_groups()

# Large Scale Test Cases






🔘 (none found) − ⏪ Replay Tests

Here is the optimized version of the code.



**Optimizations done:**
1. Removed redundant import statements.
2. Used f-strings for concatenated strings for better readability and performance.
3. Simplified some function expressions by combining conditions and using Pythonic idioms.
4. Made dictionary operations more efficient by directly iterating over items where applicable.
5. Reduced the usage of `if condition else` constructs where possible to streamline the code.
6. Combined `.add_params()` and `.add_fields()` calls for clarity.

Note that the performance gain from these optimizations in a network-intensive context like Facebook API calls will mostly come from cleaner logic and reduced overhead, but the actual API call performance is bound by external response times.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Nov 30, 2024
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from Saga4 November 30, 2024 01:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants