Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding support for using KinesisStreamSpecification with DynamoDB #1889

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2021

Conversation

workmanw
Copy link
Contributor

@workmanw workmanw commented Apr 11, 2021

DynamoDB added KDS integration a few months back. Just this past week they added support to CloudFormation. We've been eagerly waiting on this for our application.

See: DynamoDB table KinesisStreamSpecification

This is my first pull request to this project so please provide me with any and all feedback. I'm happy to do what is necessary to get this feature added. Thank you!

@workmanw workmanw force-pushed the ddb-kds-support branch 2 times, most recently from eb97f79 to 56f00f9 Compare April 11, 2021 21:03
@workmanw
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bump

I would appreciate any feedback so I can work toward getting this merged.

@markpeek markpeek merged commit 2276237 into cloudtools:master Apr 24, 2021
@markpeek
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Appreciate the changes you made to address feedback.

@workmanw
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks! Appreciate the changes you made to address feedback.

Of course! Thank you for the feedback and for maintaining this great project.

@workmanw
Copy link
Contributor Author

workmanw commented May 17, 2021

@markpeek Sorry to bug you but I'm wondering if there is a release schedule? I am hoping to have this feature available in a released version of the library in the near future.

@markpeek markpeek mentioned this pull request May 18, 2021
@markpeek
Copy link
Member

@workmanw I added you to a tracking issue for a 3.0 release

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants