fix: use shorter contract name

I forget where the limit is but looks like that was why clarinet check was failing!
citycoins · Aug 7, 2024 · a12f9f6 · a12f9f6
1 parent 40ef4fa
commit a12f9f6
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/contracts/proposals/ccip019-pox-4-stacking.clar b/contracts/proposals/ccip019-pox-4-stacking.clar
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
     (try! (contract-call? .base-dao set-extensions
       (list
         {extension: .ccd002-treasury-mia-mining-v3, enabled: true}
-        {extension: .ccd002-treasury-mia-stx-rewards-v3, enabled: true}
+        {extension: .ccd002-treasury-stx-rewards-v3, enabled: true}
       )
     ))
 
@@ -87,11 +87,11 @@
     ;; delegate stack the STX in the mining and rewards treasuries (up to 50M STX each)
     ;; MAINNET: SP21YTSM60CAY6D011EZVEVNKXVW8FVZE198XEFFP.pox4-fast-pool-v3
     (try! (contract-call? .ccd002-treasury-mia-mining-v3 delegate-stx u50000000000000 'SP21YTSM60CAY6D011EZVEVNKXVW8FVZE198XEFFP.pox4-fast-pool-v3))
-    (try! (contract-call? .ccd002-treasury-mia-stx-stacking-v3 delegate-stx u50000000000000 'SP21YTSM60CAY6D011EZVEVNKXVW8FVZE198XEFFP.pox4-fast-pool-v3))
+    (try! (contract-call? .ccd002-treasury-stx-rewards-v3 delegate-stx u50000000000000 'SP21YTSM60CAY6D011EZVEVNKXVW8FVZE198XEFFP.pox4-fast-pool-v3))
 
     ;; add treasuries to ccd005-city-data
     (try! (contract-call? .ccd005-city-data add-treasury miaId .ccd002-treasury-mia-mining-v3 "mining-v3"))
-    (try! (contract-call? .ccd005-city-data add-treasury miaId .ccd002-treasury-mia-stx-stacking-v3 "stx-v3"))
+    (try! (contract-call? .ccd005-city-data add-treasury miaId .ccd002-treasury-stx-rewards-v3 "stx-v3"))
 
     (ok true)
   )