Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding gaussian normalization #35

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
May 21, 2024
Merged

Adding gaussian normalization #35

merged 17 commits into from
May 21, 2024

Conversation

rosecers
Copy link
Contributor

@rosecers rosecers commented Mar 5, 2024

Not quite sure why it needs the volume, but that's apparently the thing.

@rosecers rosecers requested a review from arthur-lin1027 March 5, 2024 19:46
@rosecers rosecers force-pushed the normalized_mvg branch 2 times, most recently from 19e1c52 to b115fbe Compare March 5, 2024 21:49
Copy link
Collaborator

@arthur-lin1027 arthur-lin1027 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is fine, but why the nomenclature change? Are we using the word "types" instead of species in the other files?

@rosecers rosecers force-pushed the normalized_mvg branch 2 times, most recently from 1674d1b to 5a02940 Compare March 15, 2024 22:44
@arthur-lin1027 arthur-lin1027 self-requested a review April 2, 2024 15:13
Copy link
Collaborator

@arthur-lin1027 arthur-lin1027 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'm ok with merging this in now for the sake of not leaving this branch dangling for way too long, although this will likely need further iteration.

In the future I will make various tests to ensure gaussian normalization and to test other pieces of the code as well (e.g. that Jigyasa's tensor products do what they're supposed to)

@rosecers
Copy link
Contributor Author

@arthur-lin1027 should we close?

@rosecers rosecers marked this pull request as draft April 22, 2024 14:58
@arthur-lin1027 arthur-lin1027 marked this pull request as ready for review May 6, 2024 19:22
@arthur-lin1027 arthur-lin1027 requested a review from cbefan May 7, 2024 20:31
The integral of a monomial * a atom-centered gaussian does not change the gaussian in the same way that a GTO does. Hence the c term is 0.
Copy link

@cbefan cbefan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tests work, normalization seems right, very cool!

@arthur-lin1027 arthur-lin1027 merged commit c65adb6 into main May 21, 2024
4 checks passed
@arthur-lin1027 arthur-lin1027 deleted the normalized_mvg branch May 21, 2024 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants