Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the guides for running ceramic-one #96

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

JustinaPetr
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is intended to:

  • Add the guides for running ceramic-one locally and in the cloud environment
  • Update the protocol documentation to remove outdate info about TileDocuments and IPFS nodes

@stbrody stbrody requested a review from nathanielc July 15, 2024 15:41
Copy link

@nathanielc nathanielc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking great. There are a few places we should rename rust-ceramic to ceramic-one and we need to likely do the same for simpledeploy.

docs/composedb/set-up-your-environment.mdx Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/composedb/set-up-your-environment.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/protocol/js-ceramic/overview.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/protocol/js-ceramic/nodes/running-a-node.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/protocol/js-ceramic/nodes/running-a-node.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/protocol/js-ceramic/nodes/running-a-node.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/protocol/js-ceramic/nodes/running-a-node.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/protocol/js-ceramic/nodes/running-a-node.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JustinaPetr JustinaPetr requested a review from nathanielc July 16, 2024 12:25
@JustinaPetr JustinaPetr merged commit 0ccb610 into main Jul 16, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants