Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: rpc "no port provided" error by backporting #1528

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: v0.34.x-celestia
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

evan-forbes
Copy link
Member

Description

fixing this insanely annoying error so we can actually use rpcs

@evan-forbes evan-forbes requested a review from a team as a code owner November 15, 2024 17:21
@evan-forbes evan-forbes requested review from cmwaters and ninabarbakadze and removed request for a team November 15, 2024 17:21
@evan-forbes evan-forbes self-assigned this Nov 15, 2024
@@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ const (
protoUNIX = "unix"
)

//-------------------------------------------------------------
var endsWithPortPattern = regexp.MustCompile(`:[0-9]+$`)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

golangci-lint complains here

rootulp
rootulp previously approved these changes Nov 15, 2024
rach-id
rach-id previously approved these changes Nov 15, 2024
@evan-forbes evan-forbes dismissed stale reviews from rach-id and rootulp via 67834a2 November 16, 2024 19:14
@evan-forbes evan-forbes marked this pull request as draft November 16, 2024 20:19
@evan-forbes
Copy link
Member Author

marked as a draft for a sec while I debug some simple but annoying IPv6 address handling. works locally, but fails here

@cmwaters
Copy link
Contributor

What's the actual problem here?

Is it when you specify a rpc address as http://localhost:26657 as opposed to just localhost:26657 it doesn't work (because of the double colon)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants