-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 270
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore!: make the row proof range end exclusive #1376
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This is a breaking change right? I'm not sure if we've agreed on branch management / releases for celestia-core yet |
yes, it's a breaking change |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO we need a strategy on how to release breaking changes of celestia-core before we merge this
Co-authored-by: Rootul P <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rootul P <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rootul P <[email protected]>
[thinking out loud] |
The problem is a little more complex then that given our current upgrading strategy. We could be running v2 binary on a v1 network, thus celestia-core also needs to be wary of the app version |
celestia-app v2 won't use any celestia-core breaking changes that aren't present in celestia-core v1.36.1-tm-v0.34.29 because celestia-app v2.0.0-rc1 is being audited and it depends on v1.36.1-tm-v0.34.29. |
are these proofs moved elsewhere for node @rach-id ? if so, can we close this and remove them here? |
Once we release the proofs in node. I will start deprecating the endpoints. But for the proofs implementation, it will remain in core because it's used in tx proof. So we still need this PR to be part of v3 if possible. |
Description
Closes #1375
It would be nice if we could cram this change also in v2. If not, then once this change makes it to a release, we need to remember to update the app implementation and any downstream repo to use end exclusive ranges for row proofs. Would creating an issue work?
PR checklist
.changelog
(we useunclog to manage our changelog)
docs/
orspec/
) and code comments